ArticleHealthcare technology letters2024
Intraoperative patient-specific volumetric reconstruction and 3D visualization for laparoscopic liver surgery.
Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in the Design and Clinical Application of Probes for Fluorescence-Guided Laparoscopic Surgery.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Clinical efficacy of single-port transscrotal laparoscopic orchiopexy combined with hernia needle for palpable undescended testes in children.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Use of patient-specific 3D reconstruction models for en bloc resection of primary thoracic vertebral sarcomas without formal spondylectomy: illustrative cases.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Navigated hepatic tumor resection using intraoperative ultrasound imaging.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Intraoperative patient-specific volumetric reconstruction and 3D visualization for laparoscopic liver surgery.Healthcare technology letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, interventions such as laparoscopic liver surgery present unique challenges, like the significant anatomical differences between preoperative images and intraoperative scenes due to pneumoperitoneum, patient pose, and organ manipulation by surgical instruments. To address these challenges, a method for intraoperative three-dimensional reconstruction of the surgical scene, including vessels and tumors, without altering the surgical workflow, is proposed. The technique combines neural radiance field reconstructions from tracked laparoscopic videos with ultrasound three-dimensional compounding. The accuracy of our reconstructions on a clinical laparoscopic liver ablation dataset, consisting of laparoscope and patient reference posed from optical tracking, laparoscopic and ultrasound videos, as well as preoperative and intraoperative computed tomographies, is evaluated. The authors propose a solution to compensate for liver deformations due to pressure applied during ultrasound acquisitions, improving the overall accuracy of the three-dimensional reconstructions compared to the ground truth intraoperative computed tomography with pneumoperitoneum. A unified neural radiance field from the ultrasound and laparoscope data, which allows real-time view synthesis providing surgeons with comprehensive intraoperative visual information for laparoscopic liver surgery, is trained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.