Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720760›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters2024

PlutoNet: An efficient polyp segmentation network with modified partial decoder and decoder consistency training.

Tugberk Erol, Duygu Sarikaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tugberk ErolComputer Engineering Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Gazi University Ankara Türkiye.
Duygu SarikayaSchool of Computer Science University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2083-4999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning models are used to minimize the number of polyps that goes unnoticed by the experts and to accurately segment the detected polyps during interventions. Although state-of-the-art models are proposed, it remains a challenge to define representations that are able to generalize well and that mediate between capturing low-level features and higher-level semantic details without being redundant. Another challenge with these models is that they are computation and memory intensive, which can pose a problem with real-time applications. To address these problems, PlutoNet is proposed for polyp segmentation which requires only 9 FLOPs and 2,626,537 parameters, less than 10% of the parameters required by its counterparts. With PlutoNet, a novel

Indexed as

computer visionconvolutional neural netsimage segmentationlearning (artificial intelligence)medical image processingneural nets

Identifiers

PMID39720760
PMCPMC11665777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.