ArticleHealthcare technology letters2024
AR-assisted surgery: Precision placement of patient specific hip implants based on 3D printed PSIs.
Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Accuracy of a Dual-Function AR-Guided System for PSI Positioning and Osteotomy Execution in Pelvic Tumour Surgery: A Cadaveric Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- AR-assisted surgery: Precision placement of patient specific hip implants based on 3D printed PSIs.Healthcare technology letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-specific implant placement in the case of pelvic tumour resection is usually a complex procedure, where the planned optimal position of the prosthesis may differ from the final location. This discrepancy arises from incorrect or differently executed bone resection and improper final positioning of the prosthesis. In order to overcome such mismatch, a navigation solution is presented based on an augmented reality application for HoloLens 2 to assist the entire procedure. This involves placing patient-specific instruments for tumour resection guidance in the supraacetabular, ischial and symphysial regions, performing the osteotomy and assisting within the adequate positioning of the implant. The supraacetabular patient-specific instrument and the prosthesis included optical markers attached to them to be used as reference for surgical guidance. The proposed application and workflow were validated by two clinicians on six phantoms, designed and fabricated from different cadaver specimens. The accuracy of the solution was evaluated by comparing the final position after navigation with the position defined in the surgical plan. Preliminary assessment shows promising results for the guidance system, with positive clinician feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.