ReviewInternational journal of women's health2024
Patient Selection for the Use of Niraparib in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Review.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probing 3-Amino-2H-Azaindazoles as Allosteric Inhibitors of the Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP2.ChemMedChem · 2026Article
- PARP inhibitors and breast cancer: from therapeutic breakthrough to resistance challenge.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Comparison Study of the Safety Profile of Olaparib Versus Niraparib: Analysis of Real-World Data from EudraVigilance.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Venous Thromboembolism in Women with Breast and Gynaecological Cancers: What Do We Know and What Should We Do?Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has resulted in a significant paradigm shift in ovarian cancer treatment. Niraparib, a potent PARP inhibitor, has demonstrated substantial efficacy in both first-line and recurrent disease settings. By targeting homologous recombination DNA repair, a pathway frequently disrupted in ovarian cancer, particularly in the context of BRCA mutations, niraparib induces synthetic lethality. Pivotal clinical trials, including PRIMA, ENGOT-OV16/NOVA, and QUADRA, have solidified niraparib's role in the treatment paradigm. While sharing a common mechanism of action with other PARP inhibitors, niraparib exhibits a distinct toxicity profile. Notably, hematologic toxicities, particularly thrombocytopenia, and hypertension have been observed at Grade 3-4 levels. A comprehensive understanding of niraparib's efficacy and safety is essential for optimal patient selection and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.