Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720625›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2024

Attendance rate and perceived relevance related to type, content, and delivery of current rehabilitation programmes after surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer.

Mette Kaasgaard, Uffe Bodtger, Anders Løkke, Erik Jakobsen, Ole Hilberg

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07460999 (Effects and Mechanisms of Online Delivered Singing Training vs Usual Care in Patients With Persistent Symptoms 6-18 Months After Surgical Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07460999 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects and Mechanisms of Online Delivered Singing Training vs Usual Care in Patients With Persistent Symptoms 6-18 Months After Surgical Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) - a Multi-centre RCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Chronic Obstructive Lung DiseaseArmsSinging training (Singing for Lung Health (SLH)), Control group: Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mette KaasgaardPulmonary Research Unit (PLUZ), Department of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde and Naestved, Naestved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.
Uffe BodtgerPulmonary Research Unit (PLUZ), Department of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde and Naestved, Naestved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.
Anders LøkkePulmonary Research Unit (PLUZ), Department of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde and Naestved, Naestved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.
Erik JakobsenDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Ole HilbergPulmonary Research Unit (PLUZ), Department of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde and Naestved, Naestved Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical resection is the preferred treatment for localised non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Rehabilitation is central in the management of the associated impaired quality of life, high symptom burden, deconditioning, and social-existential vulnerability. Yet, optimal content and delivery of rehabilitation are not yet defined. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the current rehabilitation offers, attendance rate, and perceived relevance related to content or delivery. Moreover, we investigated the current symptom burden in the patients. Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study in patients who had undergone surgical resection for NSCLC 4-6 months earlier at Odense University Hospital, Denmark. We retrieved demographic data from patient registries, and interviewed patients via telephone concerning availability, uptake, and attendance rate of any rehabilitation offer in their local primary care setting; content and delivery; benefits of attending, experienced relevance and "symptom burden generally" (specially developed questions); and "symptom burden here and now" [Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS)]. Results: We approached 128 patients, reached 115, and interviewed the 100 (87%) patients who consented. In total, 88% (88/100) had received a rehabilitation offer, and 75% (66/88) had participated in programmes that either targeted NSCLC (23%) or were general cancer rehabilitation (33%), pulmonary rehabilitation (12%), online (1%), or other (33%). Disease-specific rehabilitation was significantly related to the highest attendance rate and perception of relevance. High attendance (≥75%) was, moreover, significantly related to the offer being delivered by a physiotherapist and having a focus on physical exercise. General symptoms were physically oriented [dyspnoea (65%), pain (47%), fatigue (78%)] and "mild" in ESAS scoring. No differences were observed in any baseline characteristics. Conclusions: Rehabilitation after surgical resection for localised NSCLC is delivered heterogeneously in Denmark. Disease-specific rehabilitation was positively related to attendance rate and to the perceived relevance of the offer.

Indexed as

attendance rateexercise traininglung cancerquality of liferehabilitationsymptom burden

Identifiers

PMID39720625
PMCPMC11666536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.