ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Novel type 2 diabetes prediction score based on traditional risk factors and circulating metabolites: model derivation and validation in two large cohort studies.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning and artificial intelligence in type 2 diabetes prediction: a comprehensive 33-year bibliometric and literature analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Associations of Life's Essential 8 cardiovascular health score with prevalent microvascular complications stratified by sex and menopausal status in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2026Article
- A cardiometabolic risk phenotype index integrating insulin resistance, systemic inflammation, and psychological burden for mortality risk stratification in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: an exploratory longitudinal analysis of a nationally representative cohort.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Prognostic Score Model for 30-Day Mortality in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Presenting to the Emergency Department.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Large-Scale Proteomics Uncovers Pre-Disease Inflammation-Lipid Subtypes to Refine Risk Stratification and Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Large-scale multi-omics enhance risk prediction for type 2 diabetes.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Serum metabolites associated with depression and anxiety in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.Translational psychiatry · 2026Observational
- Plasma Metabolite Associations for Risk and Laboratory Measures of Type 2 Diabetes in a Large-Scale Finnish Prospective Cohort.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- Association of albumin trajectories and cumulative exposure with in-hospital mortality in acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Metabolomics in Traditional Chinese Medicine for Diabetes Mellitus: Mechanistic Insights, Biomarker Discovery, and Clinical Application Prospects.International journal of analytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Metabolomic profiling refines cardiovascular risk stratification beyond SCORE2-diabetes in patients with concurrent type 2 diabetes and pulmonary dysfunction.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Lipidomic signatures as predictive biomarkers for early-onset lung cancer: Identification and development of a risk prediction model.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Exercise-induced metabolic remodeling in type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights from metabolomics.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Association between mental health and MASLD molecular insights through metabolomics.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Serum Metabolites Associated with Depression and Anxiety in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- An online explainable ensemble machine learning model for predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Temporal trends in the planetary health diet index and its association with cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic diseases: A comprehensive analysis from global and individual perspectives.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2025Article
- Association of serum neurofilament light chain and bone mineral density in adults.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Advances in Metabolomics: A Comprehensive Review of Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate the incremental predictive value of metabolomic biomarkers for assessing the 10-year risk of type 2 diabetes when added to the clinical Cambridge Diabetes Risk Score (CDRS). Methods: We utilized 86,232 UK Biobank (UKB) participants (recruited between 13 March 2006 and 1 October 2010) for model derivation and internal validation. Additionally, we included 4383 participants from the German ESTHER cohort (recruited between 1 July 2000 and 30 June 2002 for external validation). Participants were followed up for 10 years to assess the incidence of type 2 diabetes. A total of 249 NMR-derived metabolites were quantified using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Metabolites were selected with LASSO regression and model performance was evaluated with Harrell's C-index. Findings: 11 metabolomic biomarkers, including glycolysis related metabolites, ketone bodies, amino acids, and lipids, were selected. In internal validation within the UKB, adding these metabolites significantly increased the C-index (95% confidence interval (95% CI)) of the clinical CDRS from 0.815 (0.800, 0.829) to 0.834 (0.820, 0.847) and the continuous net reclassification index (NRI) with 95% CI was 39.8% (34.6%, 45.0%). External validation in the ESTHER cohort showed a comparable statistically significant C-index increase from 0.770 (0.750, 0.791) to 0.798 (0.779, 0.817) and a continuous NRI of 33.8% (26.4%, 41.2%). A concise model with 4 instead of 11 metabolites yielded similar results. Interpretation: Adding 11 metabolites to the clinical CDRS led to a novel type 2 diabetes prediction model, we called UK Biobank Diabetes Risk Score (UKB-DRS), substantially outperformed the clinical CDRS. The concise version with 4 metabolites performed comparably. As only very few clinical information and a blood sample are needed for the UKB-DRS, and as high-throughput NMR metabolomics are becoming increasingly available at low costs, these models have considerable potential for routine clinical application in diabetes risk assessment. Funding: The ESTHER study was funded by grants from the Baden-Württemberg state Ministry of Science, Research and Arts (Stuttgart, Germany), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Berlin, Germany), the Federal Ministry of Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (Berlin, Germany), and the Saarland State Ministry of Health, Social Affairs, Women and the Family (Saarbrücken, Germany). The UK Biobank project was established through collaboration between various entities including the Wellcome Trust, the Medical Research Council, Department of Health, Scottish Government, and the Northwest Regional Development Agency. Additional funding was provided by the Welsh Assembly Government, British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, and Diabetes UK, with support from the National Health Service (NHS). The German Diabetes Center is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health (Berlin, Germany) and the Ministry of Culture and Science of the state North Rhine-Westphalia (Düsseldorf, Germany) and receives additional funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.