ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Gaps in the management of adrenal insufficiency in melanoma survivors: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to limited data on managing immunotherapy-induced secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) in melanoma survivors, this study investigated its management strategies and outcomes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with SAI (Mel_SAI, n = 161), without SAI (Mel_CON, n = 168), and patients with pituitary adenoma-related SAI (Pit_SAI, n = 106) at our institution from January 2013 to November 2023. We compared glucocorticoid management patterns, quality of life using distress scores, and the impact of different glucocorticoid types on survival outcomes using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Findings: Mel_SAI received significantly higher initial (median: 30 mg; IQR: 20-30 mg) and maintenance (median: 25 mg; IQR: 20-30 mg) hydrocortisone doses than Pit_SAI (initial: 20 mg; IQR: 15-30 mg; maintenance: 15 mg; IQR: 15-23 mg). Over half of Mel_SAI received prednisone as initial glucocorticoid replacement (n = 89, 55%), compared to 27% (n = 29) of Pit_SAI. Distress scores were significantly higher in Mel_SAI (median: 3; IQR: 2-5) than in Pit_SAI (median: 2; IQR: 1-3), but similar between Mel_CON. Prednisone use was associated with decreased survival in Mel_SAI (hazard ratio: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.14-4.46). Interpretation: Higher glucocorticoid doses and prednisone use in melanoma patients with SAI may be due to higher distress scores rather than SAI itself. Given the negative impact on survival and potential side effects, we recommend hydrocortisone at standard doses as the preferred glucocorticoid replacement in melanoma patients with SAI. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.