ArticleBMJ neurology open2024
An updated systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the efficacy and safety of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and effectiveness of diroximel fumarate in relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- The Neurovascular Niche: A Gathering Venue for Neuroinflammation and Remyelination in Multiple Sclerosis.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- GASDERMIN D-mediated pyroptosis as a therapeutic target in TAU-dependent frontotemporal dementia mouse model.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Fingolimod and Dimethyl Fumarate in Preclinical Pancreatic Cancer Models.Oncology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is increasingly used in treating multiple sclerosis (MS) with controversial results of the safety and efficacy of different DMF doses. We aimed to systematically review the literature to examine the safety and efficacy of DMF for MS patients. Methods: We searched PubMed Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus databases and clinicaltrials.gov up to June 2023 for the published trials evaluating the use of DMF for MS in adults. All included studies were screened and abstracted independently by two authors. Efficacy and safety outcome measures were extracted. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Results: 10 studies including eight randomised controlled trials, one open-label and one single-arm before-after study with a total population size of 4278 patients were included. DMF group showed a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of relapses compared with the control group, (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: [0.41, 0.55], p<0.00001) with no statistical differences between 240 mg two times per day and three times a day doses. Furthermore, the DMF group had a significant reduction in Gd-enhanced lesions compared with control (MD=-1.53, 95% CI: [-1.91 to -1.41], p<0.00001). Our results showed a non-significant difference in adverse events that led to discontinuation of the study with an OR of 1.29 (95% CI: [0.98, 1.71], p value=0.07). Discussion: DMF had significant efficacy and safety compared with the control, with no difference between the DMF doses. More studies with large sample sizes and longer follow-ups are needed to detect long-term safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.