Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720512›Full record

ArticleBMJ neurology open2024

An updated systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the efficacy and safety of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Hossam Tharwat Ali, Amr Mahmoud Yousef, Sara Hosny El-Farargy, Ahmed Mohamed Abdelmonhem, Dalia Atef Abouda, Ahmed Mamdoh Mahmoud, Ammar Arafat Elsayed, Hazem Khaled Hassaan, Ahmed M Afifi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ neurology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Safety and effectiveness of diroximel fumarate in relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hossam Tharwat AliQena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-5911
Amr Mahmoud YousefBenha Students' Innovation and Research Association (BSIRA), Benha, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7529-0645
Sara Hosny El-FarargyBenha Students' Innovation and Research Association (BSIRA), Benha, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-3691-7772
Ahmed Mohamed AbdelmonhemBenha Students' Innovation and Research Association (BSIRA), Benha, Egypt.
Dalia Atef AboudaBenha Students' Innovation and Research Association (BSIRA), Benha, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0000-5265-2447
Ahmed Mamdoh MahmoudBenha Students' Innovation and Research Association (BSIRA), Benha, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-8943-3368
Ammar Arafat ElsayedBenha Students' Innovation and Research Association (BSIRA), Benha, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0004-1803-9090
Hazem Khaled HassaanBenha Students' Innovation and Research Association (BSIRA), Benha, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0003-9868-3232
Ahmed M AfifiAin Shams University, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is increasingly used in treating multiple sclerosis (MS) with controversial results of the safety and efficacy of different DMF doses. We aimed to systematically review the literature to examine the safety and efficacy of DMF for MS patients. Methods: We searched PubMed Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus databases and clinicaltrials.gov up to June 2023 for the published trials evaluating the use of DMF for MS in adults. All included studies were screened and abstracted independently by two authors. Efficacy and safety outcome measures were extracted. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Results: 10 studies including eight randomised controlled trials, one open-label and one single-arm before-after study with a total population size of 4278 patients were included. DMF group showed a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of relapses compared with the control group, (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: [0.41, 0.55], p<0.00001) with no statistical differences between 240 mg two times per day and three times a day doses. Furthermore, the DMF group had a significant reduction in Gd-enhanced lesions compared with control (MD=-1.53, 95% CI: [-1.91 to -1.41], p<0.00001). Our results showed a non-significant difference in adverse events that led to discontinuation of the study with an OR of 1.29 (95% CI: [0.98, 1.71], p value=0.07). Discussion: DMF had significant efficacy and safety compared with the control, with no difference between the DMF doses. More studies with large sample sizes and longer follow-ups are needed to detect long-term safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Identifiers

PMID39720512
PMCPMC11667417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.