Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720503›Full record

ReviewUS cardiology2021

Shockwave and Non-transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Eden C Payabyab, Lindsay S Elbaum, Navneet Sharma, Isaac George, Stephanie L Mick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in US cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eden C PayabyabDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine New York City, NY.
Lindsay S ElbaumDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital New York City, NY.
Navneet SharmaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital New York City, NY.
Isaac GeorgeNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center New York City, NY.
Stephanie L MickDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine New York City, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a widely adopted treatment modality for severe aortic stenosis. Transfemoral access is the approach of choice; however, approximately 25% of patients undergoing TAVR also have concomitant peripheral arterial disease. The recent advent of intravascular lithotripsy has enabled preservation of transfemoral access in some patients; although, a proportion still require alternative, non-femoral access. Alternative access sites can be broadly categorized into transthoracic and peripheral, facilitated by surgical or percutaneous techniques. In this review, the technical details and clinical outcomes of various TAVR accesses are discussed. Initially, transthoracic approaches were most common, but recently, the trend has been toward alternative peripheral access due to superior outcomes. Although there are no randomized data to support all the alternative access sites, the experiences reported provide available options for a large portion of patients to be candidates for TAVR. The intervention site should be selected by a multidisciplinary heart team based on patient anatomical factors and institutional expertise.

Indexed as

alternative accessShockwavetransaxillarytranscarotidTranscatheter aortic valve replacementtranscavaltransthoracic

Identifiers

PMID39720503
PMCPMC11664780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.