Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720470›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2024

Diastasis recti in children - results of ultrasonographic study.

Agata Maria Kawalec-Rutkowska, Marian Simka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agata Maria Kawalec-RutkowskaDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5030-9546
Marian SimkaDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2891-6083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Diastasis recti is a common contour abnormality of the anterior abdominal wall, where an increased distance between the rectus abdominis muscles results in a visible or palpable bulge in this area. This study aimed to characterize this clinical entity in children. Material and methods: Anatomy of the rectus abdominis muscles and the linea alba, with a special focus on the interrectus distance (distance between two bellies of the rectus abdominis muscles), was studied using ultrasound. Anthropometric and ultrasonographic assessments were performed on 38 children aged 7-12 years. According to the clinical definition of bulging in the epigastrium, diastasis was diagnosed in 12 children (31.6%), significantly more often in boys than in girls (50.0% vs. 6.3%). Other clinical and anthropometric variables, such as age, history of preterm birth, body mass, body mass index, waist circumference, and height, were not significantly associated with diastasis recti. Results: Diastasis recti, defined by the ultrasonographic criterion of interrectus distance >20 mm, was found in 10 children (26.3%), with no significant differences between boys and girls. Still, there was a moderate agreement between these two modes of diagnosing diastasis: the Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.49. This suggests that ultrasonographic measurement of the interrectus distance should not be considered an alternative and more precise method of diagnosing diastasis. Conclusions: Our study indicates that diastasis recti is quite common in the pediatric population, especially among boys. However, more studies are needed in children to understand the functional relevance and natural course of this clinical entity.

Indexed as

abnormalitiesanatomychilddiastasis rectirectus abdominis

Identifiers

PMID39720470
PMCPMC11665052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.