ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2025
Enhancing human phenotype ontology term extraction through synthetic case reports and embedding-based retrieval: A novel approach for improved biomedical data annotation.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review on the generative AI applications in human medical genetics.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Pooled it
- DFGLM-TCM: an integrated knowledge-and experience-driven large language model system for Traditional Chinese Medicine practice.Chinese medicine · 2026Article
- OntoCodex: a multi-agent biomedical ontology enrichment framework.npj health systems · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of Synthetic Data Generation by Language Models in Biomedical Research and Application: Data Utility and Quality Perspectives.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2026Review
- Extraction of Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) Concepts from Clinical Notes Utilizing Large Language Models (LLM) with Model Context Protocol (MCP).medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Integrating Knowledge: The Power of Ontologies in Psychiatric Research and Clinical Informatics.Biological psychiatry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing utilization of exome and genome sequencing in clinical and research genetics, accurate and automated extraction of human phenotype ontology (HPO) terms from clinical texts has become imperative. Traditional methods for HPO term extraction, such as PhenoTagger, often face limitations in coverage and precision. In this study, we propose a novel approach that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic sentences with clinical context, which were semantically encoded into vector embeddings. These embeddings are linked to HPO terms, creating a robust knowledgebase that facilitates precise information retrieval. Our method circumvents the known issue of LLM hallucinations by storing and querying these embeddings within a true database, ensuring accurate context matching without the need for a predictive model. We evaluated the performance of three different embedding models, all of which demonstrated substantial improvements over PhenoTagger. Top recall (sensitivity), precision (positive-predictive value, PPV), and F1 are 0.64, 0.64, and 0.64, respectively, which were 31%, 10%, and 21% better than PhenoTagger. Furthermore, optimal performance was achieved when we combined the best performing embedding model with PhenoTagger (a.k.a. Fused model), resulting in recall (sensitivity), precision (PPV), and F1 values of 0.7, 0.7, and 0.7, respectively, which are 10%, 10%, and 10% better than the best embedding models. Our findings underscore the potential of this integrated approach to enhance the precision and reliability of HPO term extraction, offering a scalable and effective solution for biomedical data annotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.