ArticleCureus2024
Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Disease, 1990-2021: Results From the 2021 Global Burden of Disease Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention strategies for coronary small-vessel disease: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases among postmenopausal women, 1990-2040: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.Journal of advanced research · 2026Pooled it
- Towards a better understanding of brief lifestyle interventions in noncommunicable diseases: a concept analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Engineering heterogeneous tissues and organs via multi-material bioprinting: Advances, challenges, and opportunities.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- Balance and Mobility Impairment in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease Before and After Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Use of the Teach-Back Method in Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nighttime Cold Stress and Cardiovascular Emergency Hospitalizations: A Time-Series Analysis by Sex and Age in a Subtropical City.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Article
- When more diagnoses do not mean more disease: a data-driven reassessment of global chronic disease trends, 2011-2025.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Predicting Daily Cardiovascular Emergencies Using Weather and Air Quality Data: A 23-Year Machine-Learning Analysis in Taiwan.GeoHealth · 2026Article
- Comparison of deep learning reconstruction algorithms to improve image quality of dual-energy carotid CT angiography under dual-low scan.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Angiopoietin-like Protein 3 (ANGPTL3) Targeting in the Management of Dyslipidemias.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mechanistic insights and challenges in mitochondrial regulation of macrophage polarization and inflammatory responses.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Targeting the CD47-SIRPα Axis in Atherosclerosis: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutic Implications.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Sex-specific effects of resveratrol and metformin on mitochondrial function and inflammatory activation in a TNF-α-driven human iPSC-derived endothelial dysfunction model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Association between coronary artery calcification and cardiometabolic, hepatic, and renal markers in a Chinese population undergoing health examinations.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2026Article
- HbA1c-to-HDL-C ratio and risk of incident cardiovascular disease among older adults: evidence from a 7-year prospective cohort study in southwestern China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Global burden of cardiovascular disease attributable to lead exposure: based on the global burden of disease study 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Preparation and evaluation of a small-diameter vascular graft with dual anticoagulant and anticalcification functions.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Dissecting Depression in Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Evidence That Comorbidity is Associated with Higher Depression Network Strength.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including coronary artery disease, ischemic heart disease, stroke, cardiomyopathy, and atrial fibrillation and flutter, are the leading cause of mortality worldwide, resulting in significant economic and health costs. Recognizing trends and geographical differences in the global burden of CVD facilitates health authorities in particular nations to assess the disease burden and forecast future epidemiological trends. Public health authorities in each country can better understand the differences in disease data and, by learning from the experiences and practices of successful countries and considering the characteristics of their diseases, allocate health resources more rationally and formulate more targeted healthcare strategies to reduce the disease burden. This study aims to comprehensively assess CVD trends and geographic variations from 1990 to 2021. Methods This study focuses on analyzing global trends in the epidemiology of all-age CVD incidence and death over the past 30 years. A vital registration system, cause-of-death inference records, and a cause-of-death ensemble model (CODEm) were used to estimate cause-specific mortality for CVD, with CODEm estimates adjusted using a cause-of-death correction (CoDCorrect) algorithm. Incidence data were extracted from insurance claims and inpatient discharge sources and analyzed with Disease Modeling Meta-Regression, Version 2.1 (DisMod-MR 2.1). Data were extracted from the 2021 Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD 2021) on the number of incident cases and deaths, as well as age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) and age-standardized death rates (ASDR) for CVD for each year from 1990 to 2021. We visualized and reported this data at the global, regional, and national levels. To explore the association between the burden of CVD and sociodemographic factors, we used the sociodemographic index (SDI), which categorizes the world's 204 nations into five SDI regions. Because the GBD results are a combination of data and estimates, 95% uncertainty intervals (UI) are provided for each count and rate (per 100,000 populations). Results Globally, the number of CVD incident cases and deaths increased from 34.74 million and 12.33 million in 1990 to 66.81 million and 19.42 million in 2021, representing a 92.3% and 57.5% rise, respectively. However, the global ASIR and ASDR for CVD have decreased by 10.4% and 34.3%, respectively, since 1990. Notably, among the 21 regions of the world, the ASIR for CVD is on a downward trend from 1990 to 2021, except for East and Central Asia, where the ASIR for CVD increased by 3% and 14.3%, respectively. Similarly, the global ASDR for CVD is only on an upward trend in sub-Saharan Africa, increasing by 12%, while all other regions are on a downward trend. Among the five SDI regions, the high SDI region has much lower ASIR and ASDR compared to the world average, and these rates have decreased significantly over the years. Conclusion Despite a significant increase in the number of CVD incident cases and deaths worldwide over the last three decades, ASIR and ASDR have been declining. Over the past 30 years, both ASIR and ASDR for CVD have declined significantly in high SDI areas, while CVD continues to pose a serious public health threat in regions with low SDI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.