ReviewCureus2024
Comparative Efficacy and Long-Term Outcomes of Beta-Blockers Alone or in Combination With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitors in Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hormonal Modulation in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: From Neurohormonal Activation to Endocrine Targets.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Combination Therapy With Beta-Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for Cardiovascular Diseases: Focus on Bisoprolol/Ramipril.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Review
- Efficacy of beta-blockers in the treatment of hematidrosis: A systematic review.World journal of experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-07-16Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · False/Forged Authorship · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review provides a comprehensive comparison of beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the management of chronic heart failure (CHF), with a focus on their long-term efficacy and safety profiles. By synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical studies, the review highlights the significant benefits of both drug classes in reducing mortality and hospital readmissions, and improving patient outcomes. Beta-blockers, such as bisoprolol and carvedilol, demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing sudden cardiac death, particularly in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, including enalapril and lisinopril, effectively lowered overall cardiovascular mortality by targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and preventing further cardiac remodeling. The findings of this review underscore the importance of utilizing these therapies, either alone or in combination, for optimal heart failure management. Combining beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors, or integrating them with newer agents such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), provides an additive benefit, improving long-term survival and reducing heart failure-related hospitalizations. The review also identifies gaps in the current literature, suggesting that future research should focus on personalized treatment approaches, longer follow-up periods, and exploring novel therapeutic combinations for diverse heart failure populations. This evidence reinforces the role of beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors as foundational therapies in CHF and offers actionable insights for clinicians to enhance patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.