ReviewCureus2024
Triple Therapy IDP-126 Gel for Acne Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acne vulgaris (AV) is a common dermatological condition that ranges from mild comedones to severe inflammatory nodules and scarring. Effective management is essential for improving patients' quality of life. The recent FDA approval of IDP-126 (Cabtreo™), a novel triple-combination gel, meets these needs by combining clindamycin phosphate, benzoyl peroxide, and adapalene into a single formulation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and impact of IDP-126 on quality of life in managing AV. The study's goal was to provide clinicians with the necessary information to consider including this medication in acne treatment plans. A total of 281 articles were manually screened, and three studies (n = 388) met the inclusion criteria. Standardized mean differences were used to quantify lesion reductions, while pooled ORs assessed adverse events. Additional references were reviewed to address potential gaps in the reported outcomes. IDP-126 showed significant reductions in inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions compared to vehicle treatments and demonstrated favorable numbers needed to treat compared to other topical therapies. It was associated with application site pain and erythema. Notable improvements in quality of life were observed across various domains related to acne severity. IDP-126 is an effective treatment for AV, offering substantial clinical benefits and improving quality of life. While it is associated with higher rates of certain adverse effects, its overall efficacy supports its inclusion in treatment regimens, provided that its safety profile is carefully managed to optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.