ReviewCureus2024
Efficacy of Early Goal-Directed Therapy in Septic Shock Management: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of patients with unstable circulation transported by a physician-staffed helicopter using the keyword method in Japan.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Septic shock is a serious and life-threatening illness marked by potentially fatal and metabolic abnormalities, leading to high mortality rates in adult patients. Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) was introduced as a systematic approach to manage septic shock through early, protocol-based hemodynamic optimization to improve outcomes. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of EGDT in managing adult patients with septic shock. A comprehensive search was conducted in multiple databases to identify relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, and observational studies with control groups were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using appropriate tools, and data was extracted for synthesis. This systemic review of 31 observational and RCT studies highlights the shortcomings of the one-size-fits-all EGDT strategy for septic shock. Although the preliminary research was encouraging, more recent studies have shown how important customized approaches are. Sophisticated monitoring methods such as tissue oxygenation and OER show potential in supporting customized hemodynamic therapy. Rigid protocols might not be the best option, but early intervention is essential. A move toward individualized treatment is necessary to enhance the prognosis of individuals suffering from septic shock. Future research should focus on well-designed RCTs, exploring comparative effectiveness, sustainability, and alternative monitoring techniques to refine the role of EGDT and develop more effective, evidence-based management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.