ArticleCureus2024
Development and Characterization of Novel Dental Composites Using Locally Sourced Materials in Pakistan.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveDental composites' dependence on pricey imported components often raises price concerns and restricts accessibility in restorative dentistry. In Pakistan, using locally produced materials presents a viable alternative for more affordable and environmentally friendly dental treatments. This study aimed to develop and evaluate dental composites sourced from locally available materials in Pakistan for cost-effectiveness, performance, and durability. METHODOLOGY: A study comprising 385 patients, aged 18-65 years, who underwent composite restorations made of novel materials, was carried out at Sardar Begum Dental College, Peshawar, from January 2023 to December 2023. Patient comfort, aesthetic quality, and durability were the three main criteria used to assess clinical performance. The physical characteristics of adhesion strength, wear resistance, and hardness were evaluated in lab settings. Costs for materials, processing, and clinical application were all considered in a thorough cost study. SPSS version 26 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) was used for the statistical analysis, and both descriptive and inferential statistics were used. The novel composites were compared with standard materials using t-tests, and cost differences were assessed. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsThe novel composites exhibited superior performance with a durability of 12.57 ± 1.83 months (n = 385 patients), compared to 11.05 ± 2.38 months for conventional composites (p < 0.05). They also scored higher in aesthetic quality (8.35 ± 1.48 vs. 7.82 ± 1.59) and patient comfort (4.52 ± 0.79 vs. 4.27 ± 0.83) (p < 0.05). Laboratory tests showed greater hardness (48.79 ± 3.22 Vickers), better wear resistance (0.28 ± 0.05 mm³), and higher adhesion strength (22.96 ± 1.68 MPa) (p < 0.05). Cost analysis revealed significant savings, with total costs per patient of PKR 8,980 for novel composites vs. PKR 33,000 for conventional composites (p < 0.05).
conclusionNovel dental composites developed from locally sourced materials demonstrate superior performance and significant cost reductions, highlighting their potential to enhance the accessibility and affordability of dental care in Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.