ArticlePediatric investigation2024
Real-world use of emicizumab in Chinese children with hemophilia A: Retrospective data from a comprehensive care center.
Article in Pediatric investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcomes of Emicizumab Treatment for Haemophilia A Paediatric Patients: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaPooled it
- Transition to Emicizumab from standard-dose FVIII prophylaxis in young children with hemophilia A: a real-world study.Thrombosis journal · 2026Article
- From pharmacokinetic-guided FVIII prophylaxis to low-dose Emicizumab prophylaxis: a pilot study revealed a flush of hope.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Prospective, Observational Study of the Clinical Outcomes of FVIII Treatment in Adults and Adolescents with Severe Haemophilia A.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Real-world use of emicizumab in Chinese children with hemophilia A: Retrospective data from a comprehensive care center.Pediatric investigation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Emicizumab (EMI) is efficacious and safe for hemophilia A (HA) prophylaxis. However, its high cost poses a challenge in China. Objective: To explore the possibility of using reduced-dosage EMI in Chinese HA children. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study for HA children in our Comprehensive Care Center. Data were collected pre- and post-EMI treatment to evaluate bleeding rates. Laboratory analyses included factor VIII (FVIII)-like activity and EMI concentration measurements. Results: Thirty-four HA children receiving EMI prophylaxis for a median (range) 24.5 (2.5-47.9) months by June 2023. Of these, 25 (73.5%) were under 3 years of age, 26 (76.5%) had severe hemophilia and 12 (35.3%) were minimally treated or previously untreated patients. Thirty-one (91.2%) of the 34 patients received reduced-dosage EMI for economic reasons. EMI concentration and FVIII-like activity measured showed a strong correlation. Overall, while on EMI, their annual treated bleeding rate (ATBR) and annual bleeding rate (ABR) decreased significantly (2-0) while their zero-bleeding rate (ZBR) increased significantly (11.5%-65.4%). After 6 months of EMI, there was no significant difference in ATBR and ABR among various maintenance dosages. However, ZBR was significantly lower in dosages under 4 mg/kg ( Interpretation: We showed EMI effectively prevented bleeding even at reduced dosages. However, the bleeding risk may be higher with EMI 4-weekly maintenance dosage <3.8 mg/kg, EMI concentration <48.1 μg/mL, and FVIII-like activity <15.4 IU/dL for zero bleeding. It is important that dosage reduction be done rationally. Dosage tailoring is possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.