ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for blastocyst formation during IVF/ICSI-ET.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a predictive model for early blastocyst formation on day 4 post-fertilization.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- An early prediction model for high-quality blastocyst development based on ANA titer and baseline demographic characteristics in the first IVF/ICSI cycle.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to create and validate a clinical model that predict the probability of blastocyst formation in IVF/ICSI-ET cycles. Methods: This study employed a retrospective methodology, gathering data from 4961 cleavage-stage embryos that cultured in the reproductive center's of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between June 2020 and March 2024. 3472 were in the training set and 1489 were in the validation set when it was randomly split into the training set and validation set in a 7:3 ratio. The study employed both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the factors those influence in the process of blastocyst formation. Based on the multiple regression model, a predictive model of blastocyst formation during IVF was created. The calibration and decision curves were used to assess the effectiveness and therapeutic usefulness of this model. Results: The following factors independently predicted the probability of blastocyst formation: the method of insemination, number of oocytes retrieved, pronuclear morphological score, the number of cleavage ball, cleavage embryo symmetry, fragmentation rate and morphological score and basal P levels of female. The receiver operating characteristic curve's area under the curve (AUC) in the training set is 0.742 (95% CI: 0.724,0.759), while the validation set's AUC is 0.729 (95% CI: 0.703,0.755), indicating a rather high clinical prediction capacity. Conclusion: Our generated nomogram has the ability to forecast the probability of blastocyst formation in IVF, hence can assist clinical staff in making informed decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.