ArticleAJOG global reports2025
Utilizing machine learning to predict the risk factors of episiotomy in parturient women.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Predictive Model for Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery in Multiparous Women After Active Labor Onset.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026Article
- The power of machine learning models in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Household Smoke Exposure Risk in Somalia: An Analysis With SHAP Explanations.Environmental health insights · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine Learning Approach to Predict Emergency Cesarean Sections Among Nulliparous Women.Cureus · 2025Article
- Developing and validating a risk prediction model for caesarean delivery in Northwest Amhara comprehensive specialized hospitals.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Development of a machine learning model to identify the predictors of the neonatal intensive care unit admission.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Proposing a machine learning-based model for predicting nonreassuring fetal heart.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: An Updated Systematic Review of Their Role in Obstetrics and Midwifery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Machine learning algorithms to predict epidural-related maternal fever: a retrospective study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Identifying determinants and predicting cesarean section delivery among Bangladeshi women using machine learning: Insight from BDHS 2022 Data.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Early prediction of low birth weight using boosting ensemble machine learning: A retrospective cohort study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Episiotomy has specific indications that, if properly followed, can effectively prevent women from experiencing severe lacerations that may result in significant complications like anal incontinence. However, the risk factors related to episiotomy has been the center of much debate in the medical field in the past few years. Objective: The present study used a machine learning model to predict the factors that put women at the risk of having episiotomy using intrapartum data. Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study design. Factors such as age, educational level, residency place, medical insurance, nationality, attendance at prenatal education courses, parity, gestational age, onset of labor, presence of a doula during labor, maternal health conditions like anemia, diabetes, preeclampsia, prolonged rupture of membrane, placenta abruption, presence of meconium in amniotic fluid, intrauterine growth retardation, intrauterine fetal death, maternal body mass index, and fetal distress were extracted from the electronic health record system of a tertiary-care medical center in Iran, from January 2022 to January 2023. The criteria for inclusion were vaginal delivery of a single pregnancy. Deliveries done through scheduled/emergency cesarean section or at the mother's request were excluded. The participants were divided into two groups: those who had vaginal deliveries with episiotomy and those who had vaginal deliveries without episiotomy. The significant variables, as determined by their Results: During the study period, out of 1775 vaginal deliveries, 629 (35.4%) required an episiotomy. Each model had an AUC value assigned to it: linear regression (0.85), deep learning (0.82), support vector machine (0.79), light gradient-boosting (0.79), logistic regression (0.78), XGBoost classification (0.77), random forest classification (0.76), decision tree classification (0.75), and permutation classification-knn (0.70). Linear regression had a better diagnostic performance among all the models with the area under the ROC curve (AUC): 0.85, accuracy: 0.80, precision: 0.74, recall: 0.86, and F_1 score: 0.79). Parity, labor onset, gestational age, body mass index, and doula support were the leading clinical factors related to episiotomy, according to their importance rankings. Conclusions: Utilizing a clinical dataset and various machine learning models to assess the risk factors of episiotomy resulted in promising results. Further research, focusing on intrapartum clinical data and perspectives of the birth attendant, is necessary to enhance the accuracy of predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.