Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720184›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2024

Paradigm Transformation of Global Health Data Regulation: Challenges in Governance and Human Rights Protection of Cross-Border Data Flows.

Linhua Xia, Zhen Cao, Yue Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linhua XiaSchool of Economics, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhen CaoSchool of Law, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan, People's Republic of China.
Yue ZhaoSchool of Law, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, Hainan People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3719-4382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing global exchange of healthcare data requires more cohesive and effective regulatory frameworks to ensure fair access and protect patient privacy. However, cross-border regulatory rules for healthcare data diverge across countries, such as the EU, which highlights personal data rights and restricts cross-border flow of healthcare data through the GDPR, the United States, which emphasizes the free flow of healthcare data trade or services, and China, which emphasizes cross-border regulatory rules for healthcare data at the level of national data security. Such inconsistent policies often impede international medical research collaborations, undermine the effectiveness of telemedicine, and create barriers for healthcare providers to share patient information. Documents containing national human rights laws, the Global Initiative on Digital Health and the Global Digital Compact, which advocate for cooperation and behavioral co-regulation of healthcare data stakeholders to achieve the strategic goal of putting people at the center of healthcare, provide new ideas for solving the problem. Based on an exploration of these challenges, this paper proposes a harmonized, human rights-based approach that in turn bridges regulatory gaps and ensures data security, privacy, and accessibility in all countries.

Indexed as

cross-border data flowhealthcare datahuman rightsregulationsafety

Identifiers

PMID39720184
PMCPMC11668341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.