Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720175›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicine and life2024

The impact of patient support and health education on diabetes management and glycemic control.

Meshari Nawar Alotaibi, Aminah Saeed Almutairi, Fahad Abdulmajeed Alkhayal, Sulaiman Mohammed Alqahtani, Fatimah Nasser Alshehri, Mostafa Kofi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular Mechanisms and Antidiabetic Effects of Mango (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Tubeless Insulin Pump Combined with a Cloud-Based Data Management Platform: Real-World Evidence from 14,765 French People with Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meshari Nawar AlotaibiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC), Alsalam Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aminah Saeed AlmutairiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC), Alsalam Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad Abdulmajeed AlkhayalDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC), Alsalam Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sulaiman Mohammed AlqahtaniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC), Alsalam Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fatimah Nasser AlshehriDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC), Alsalam Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mostafa KofiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic and complex medical condition that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Maintaining an adequate blood glucose level is important for patients with diabetes, and to improve glycemic control, patients need proper support and health education, which are essential components of comprehensive diabetes care. We used a rigorous approach based on the PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook principles, specifically focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English from 2005 onwards. The statistical analysis was conducted using the RevMan software. Pooled risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous data, whereas mean differences were calculated for continuous data. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also evaluated. From an initial pool of 544 records, 368 studies were examined after eliminating duplicates. Ultimately, 24 studies were deemed suitable based on the inclusion criteria. These studies involved 2437 participants in the intervention group and 2305 people in the control group. The quality assessment indicated that 41.7% of the studies were categorized as low risk, 16.7% as high risk, and 41.7% had certain concerns regarding bias. The analyses revealed noteworthy decreases in HbA1c levels in the intervention group at several time points, particularly showing improvements after 3 months. Egger's regression indicated the presence of possible publication bias. The results emphasize the crucial impact of health education and mentorship interventions on enhancing glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Interventions focused on empowering patients proved to be especially effective in enhancing diabetes management outcomes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycemic ControlHealth EducationBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHumansPatient Education as TopicBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobindiabetes managementDSMES, Diabetes Self-Management Education and Supporteducational programsglycemic controlHbA1c, Glycated Hemoglobinpatient supportROB v2, Risk of Bias Version 2SEDM, Structured Education in Diabetes ManagementT2DM, Type 2 Diabetes MellitusType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)

Identifiers

PMID39720175
PMCPMC11665752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.