ArticleJournal of medicine and life2024
Understanding the struggles of first-generation medical students and interns: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Journal of medicine and life, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic Disease Prevalence and Modifiable Risk Factors Among Undergraduate Students at Ha'il University: A Population-Level Cross-Sectional Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- The Value of First-Generation College Students in Medicine: Bridging Gaps and Driving Innovation.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explored the experiences of first-generation and non-first-generation medical students in Saudi Arabia regarding their education, career aspirations, attitudes toward medical school, and perceived stress. We aimed to provide insights into the struggles faced by first-generation medical students. This cross-sectional study was conducted with 485 participants, 77.9% of whom were first-generation students. Data were collected using a questionnaire adapted from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and analyzed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests. First-generation students were less decisive about future specialties, showed greater interest in taking the United States Medical Licensing Examination and the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board exams, and expressed less interest in teaching roles than their non-first-generation counterparts. No significant differences were found in attitude, career considerations, quality of life, or daily activities. This study aligns with global calls for robust support programs, mentorship initiatives, and systemic interventions to enhance diversity and inclusivity in medical education. The research highlighted the importance of recognizing the diverse career aspirations and challenges first-generation medical students face. Tailored support programs are essential for fostering inclusivity in medical education, addressing unique needs, and enhancing students' overall well-being. Future research should continue to explore the factors influencing the experiences of first-generation and non-first-generation medical students to contribute to ongoing efforts to improve medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.