Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720150›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2024

Physical activity and tobacco smoking in the German adult population.

Zeynep Acar, Sarah Jackson, Stephanie Klosterhalfen, Daniel Kotz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zeynep AcarInstitute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9075-599X
Sarah JacksonDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5658-6168
Stephanie KlosterhalfenInstitute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1175-898X
Daniel KotzInstitute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9454-023X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractBackground: Physical inactivity and tobacco smoking remain the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In Germany, smoking prevalence is high at around 30%, and only 45% achieve the WHO recommendation for physical activity (PA). Understanding how smoking and physical inactivity co-occur can inform interventions targeting these behaviours. Methods: We analysed data from 4073 adults (≥18 years) participating in a national household survey between April and July 2022. We tested the association between PA level (not=reference/low/medium/very active) and smoking status (never=reference/ex/current smoker). Among current smokers, we tested associations between PA level and cigarettes smoked per day, time spent with and strength of urges to smoke and motivation to stop smoking. Results: Overall, 29.9% (95% CI=28.5; 31.4) reported no leisure-time PA; among current smokers, it was 39.8% (95% CI=37.3; 42.4). Higher PA levels were associated with lower odds of being a current versus never smoker (OR=0.74, 95% CI=0.69; 0.79). Among current smokers, higher PA levels were associated with smoking fewer cigarettes per day (β=-0.98, 95% CI=-1.39; -0.56), weaker urges to smoke (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.74; 0.89) and higher motivation to stop smoking (OR=1.13, 95% CI=1.02; 1.24). The association between PA and time spent with urges to smoke was not statistically significant (OR=0.93, 95% CI=0.85; 1.02). Conclusion: People who are more physically active are less likely to smoke. Current smokers with higher PA levels smoke less, are less dependent and are more motivated to quit. Further research is required to determine whether these associations are causal and, if so, whether interventions to increase PA could help people to quit smoking.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyPhysical activityPublic healthQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID39720150
PMCPMC11667452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.