ArticleChemical science2025
pH-Responsive nanotubes from asymmetric cyclic peptide-polymer conjugates.
Article in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomedicine Targeting Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Prostate Cancer: From Biological Mechanisms to Integrated Theranostic Strategies.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Functionalization of Polycaprolactone 3D Scaffolds with Hyaluronic Acid Glycine-Peptide Conjugates and Endothelial Cell Adhesion.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-assembling cyclic peptide nanotubes are fascinating supramolecular systems with promising potential for various applications, such as drug delivery, transmembrane ionic channels, and artificial light-harvesting systems. In this study, we present novel pH-responsive nanotubes based on asymmetric cyclic peptide-polymer conjugates. The pH response is introduced by a tertiary amine-based polymer, poly(dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate) (pDMAEMA) or poly(diethylamino ethyl methacrylate) (pDEAEMA) which is protonated at low pH. The self-assembling behaviour of their corresponding conjugates is investigated using different scattering and spectroscopy techniques. Compared to conjugates with hydrophilic polymeric corona, the introduction of hydrophobic polymer chains on the periphery of the cyclic peptides can prevent water molecules from penetrating through to the peptide rings, allowing the construction of hydrogen bonding interactions between cyclic peptides to form longer nanotubes. The switching between assembly and non-assembly is triggered by the change in the surrounding environmental pH, which process is controlled by the coordination between hydrophobic interactions and electrostatic repulsions. Due to the different hydrophobicity of these two polymers, the self-assembly of their corresponding conjugates varies extensively. We first demonstrate this evolution in detail and describe the relationship between the self-assembly and the inherent properties of grafted polymers, such as polymer compositions, the protonation degree of the responsive polymers and the polymer molecular weight in solutions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.