Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720121›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2024

Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation in South Africa: a case study of USAID-supported programs.

Jerome Wendoh Milimu, Lauren Parmley, Mahlodi Matjeng, Mathata Madibane, Mandisi Mabika, Jacques Livington, Joseph Lawrence, Orapeleng Motlhaoleng, Hasina Subedar, Rethabile Tsekoa and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jerome Wendoh MilimuBilateral Health Office, United States Agency for International Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Lauren ParmleyBilateral Health Office, United States Agency for International Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mahlodi MatjengBilateral Health Office, United States Agency for International Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mathata MadibaneBilateral Health Office, United States Agency for International Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mandisi MabikaBilateral Health Office, United States Agency for International Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Jacques LivingtonBilateral Health Office, United States Agency for International Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Joseph LawrenceBilateral Health Office, United States Agency for International Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Orapeleng MotlhaolengNational Department of Health, South African Government, Pretoria, South Africa.
Hasina SubedarNational Department of Health, South African Government, Pretoria, South Africa.
Rethabile TsekoaBilateral Health Office, United States Agency for International Development, Pretoria, South Africa.
Zandile MthembuBilateral Health Office, United States Agency for International Development, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the introduction of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in 2016, countries have successfully scaled-up PrEP to populations at risk of HIV acquisition, including key populations, serodiscordant couples and pregnant women. Between 2016 and 2023, there were over 5.6 million oral PrEP initiations globally. Of these, over 1.2 million occurred in South Africa, with nearly 700,000 implemented through USAID/South Africa's PEPFAR program. This case study uses WHO's Building Blocks for Health Systems Strengthening to describe USAID's oral PrEP program in South Africa, reporting experiences and lessons learned in 14 districts across 7 provinces. Key lessons include: (i) Substantial donor financial investment was critical for expanding oral PrEP in South Africa, but sustained leadership and investment from government stakeholders, such as the Department of Health and the National Treasury, have been essential for sustainability. Despite fluctuations in USAID funding, annual PrEP initiations have continued to increase in USAID-supported districts largely due to local leadership. (ii) Health information and supply chain systems required agility to monitor oral PrEP introduction and scale-up. When systems lacked agility, temporary solutions like the development of interim reporting tools were necessary. (iii) Integrating community-based and facility-based service delivery supported client-centered care. Nurses and lay health workers contributed to over 80% of the full-time equivalents supporting PrEP under USAID's human resources for health portfolio. (iv) Integrating sexual and reproductive health services with oral PrEP service delivery provided clients with comprehensive, client-centered care. (v) Other client-centered care included differentiated service delivery options, such as mobile and gazebo modalities, and expanded PrEP choice through implementation science activities for new PrEP products. (vi) USAID-supported PrEP initiations have been highest among females of reproductive age in the general population and men who have sex with men among key populations, priority populations in South Africa. As done in this case study, sharing best practices and lessons learned from USAID/South Africa's oral PrEP program can strengthen the implementation evidence base and inform more efficient PrEP service delivery, particularly as new PrEP products become available.

Indexed as

cabotegravirdapivirine ringhealth systemsHIV preventionlenacapavirPEPFAR programpre-exposure prophylaxisSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID39720121
PMCPMC11666530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.