Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720108›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Daily routines, short-term priorities, and nurses' role hamper self-management support in a hospital setting: A mixed methods study.

Susanne van Hooft, Elke Berger, Cailey van Torenburg, AnneLoes van Staa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susanne van HooftResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, P.O Box 25035, 3001 HA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Elke BergerFranciscus Academy, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Kleiweg 500, 3045 PM, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Cailey van TorenburgPulmonary and Cardiology ward, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Vlietlandplein 2, 3118 JH Schiedam, the Netherlands.
AnneLoes van StaaResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, P.O Box 25035, 3001 HA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Self-management support is widely considered a critical aspect of nursing. Still, many studies indicate that nurses frequently experience difficulties in daily practice. Objective: To gain a deeper understanding of the factors perceived by nurses to impede or promote their support of patients' self-management within the dynamic environment of the in-patient hospital setting. Design: Mixed methods design. Participants: Nurses ( Methods: The SEPSS-36 questionnaire assessed nurses' self-efficacy and performance in self-management support. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to address salient results from the questionnaire, focusing on factors influencing self-management support, goal setting, follow-up care, and the nurse's role in a hospital setting. Results: the response rate for the questionnaire study was 62 %. A paired t-test revealed a significant mean difference of 6.30 95 % CI [5.91-6.69] Conclusions: Short-term priorities such as 'getting the work done' dominate nurses' daily tasks in hospital wards, leading them to overlook often the benefits of supporting patient self-management. This narrow view of their responsibilities can hinder patient care, whereas adopting a broader perspective on the patient journey could be very beneficial.

Indexed as

Chronic diseaseHospitalsNursingQuestionnairesSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID39720108
PMCPMC11667052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.