Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720095›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Development and validation of artificial intelligence models for early detection of postoperative infections (PERISCOPE): a multicentre study using electronic health record data.

Siri L van der Meijden, Anna M van Boekel, Laurens J Schinkelshoek, Harry van Goor, Ewout W Steyerberg, Rob G H H Nelissen, Dieter Mesotten, Bart F Geerts, Mark G J de Boer, M Sesmu Arbous and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Siri L van der MeijdenIntensive Care Unit, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Anna M van BoekelIntensive Care Unit, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Laurens J SchinkelshoekHealthplus.ai B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Harry van GoorGeneral Surgery Department, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rob G H H NelissenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Dieter MesottenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Bart F GeertsHealthplus.ai B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mark G J de BoerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
M Sesmu ArbousIntensive Care Unit, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
PERISCOPE Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative infections significantly impact patient outcomes and costs, exacerbated by late diagnoses, yet early reliable predictors are scarce. Existing artificial intelligence (AI) models for postoperative infection prediction often lack external validation or perform poorly in local settings when validated. We aimed to develop locally valid models as part of the PERISCOPE AI system to enable early detection, safer discharge, and more timely treatment of patients. Methods: We developed and validated XGBoost models to predict postoperative infections within 7 and 30 days of surgery. Using retrospective pre-operative and intra-operative electronic health record data from 2014 to 2023 across various surgical specialities, the models were developed at Hospital A and validated and updated at Hospitals B and C in the Netherlands and Belgium. Model performance was evaluated before and after updating using the two most recent years of data as temporal validation datasets. Main outcome measures were model discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC)), calibration (slope, intercept, and plots), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis with net benefit). Findings: The study included 253,010 surgical procedures with 23,903 infections within 30-days. Discriminative performance, calibration properties, and clinical utility significantly improved after updating. Final AUROCs after updating for Hospitals A, B, and C were 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.83), 0.82 (95% CI 0.81-0.83), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.91) respectively for 30-day predictions on the temporal validation datasets (2022-2023). Calibration plots demonstrated adequate correspondence between observed outcomes and predicted risk. All local models were deemed clinically useful as the net benefit was higher than default strategies (treat all and treat none) over a wide range of clinically relevant decision thresholds. Interpretation: PERISCOPE can accurately predict overall postoperative infections within 7- and 30-days post-surgery. The robust performance implies potential for improving clinical care in diverse clinical target populations. This study supports the need for approaches to local updating of AI models to account for domain shifts in patient populations and data distributions across different clinical settings. Funding: This study was funded by a REACT EU grant from European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Kansen voor West.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClinical utilityModel updatingMulti-centre validationPostoperative infection

Identifiers

PMID39720095
PMCPMC11667051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.