ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Development and validation of artificial intelligence models for early detection of postoperative infections (PERISCOPE): a multicentre study using electronic health record data.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calibrated Deep-Learning Risk Indexing and Latent Behavioural Profiling for Occupational Mental-Health Risk Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- End-of-surgery prediction of postoperative infectious complications from intraoperative vital-sign dynamics.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Thirty-five years of evolving inflammatory paradigms in sepsis (1991-2025): a comprehensive mapping of immune dysregulation research, anti-inflammatory targets, and translational barriers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in geriatric infection: recent advances and prospects.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Review
- The complex task of modelling artificial intelligence workflows for forecasting postoperative risk.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for posterior capsule opacification.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: advancing diagnosis, precision surgery, and anti-VEGF therapy optimization.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative infections significantly impact patient outcomes and costs, exacerbated by late diagnoses, yet early reliable predictors are scarce. Existing artificial intelligence (AI) models for postoperative infection prediction often lack external validation or perform poorly in local settings when validated. We aimed to develop locally valid models as part of the PERISCOPE AI system to enable early detection, safer discharge, and more timely treatment of patients. Methods: We developed and validated XGBoost models to predict postoperative infections within 7 and 30 days of surgery. Using retrospective pre-operative and intra-operative electronic health record data from 2014 to 2023 across various surgical specialities, the models were developed at Hospital A and validated and updated at Hospitals B and C in the Netherlands and Belgium. Model performance was evaluated before and after updating using the two most recent years of data as temporal validation datasets. Main outcome measures were model discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC)), calibration (slope, intercept, and plots), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis with net benefit). Findings: The study included 253,010 surgical procedures with 23,903 infections within 30-days. Discriminative performance, calibration properties, and clinical utility significantly improved after updating. Final AUROCs after updating for Hospitals A, B, and C were 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.83), 0.82 (95% CI 0.81-0.83), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.91) respectively for 30-day predictions on the temporal validation datasets (2022-2023). Calibration plots demonstrated adequate correspondence between observed outcomes and predicted risk. All local models were deemed clinically useful as the net benefit was higher than default strategies (treat all and treat none) over a wide range of clinically relevant decision thresholds. Interpretation: PERISCOPE can accurately predict overall postoperative infections within 7- and 30-days post-surgery. The robust performance implies potential for improving clinical care in diverse clinical target populations. This study supports the need for approaches to local updating of AI models to account for domain shifts in patient populations and data distributions across different clinical settings. Funding: This study was funded by a REACT EU grant from European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Kansen voor West.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.