Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720086›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Optimization of extrusion conditions for development of high quality rice-lupin-pumpkin based extruded snack food.

Yeshambel Dagnaw Alefew, Abebaw Teshome Tiruneh, Tadesse Fenta Yehuala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yeshambel Dagnaw AlefewDepartment of Food Engineering, Bahir Dar Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Abebaw Teshome TirunehDepartment of Food Engineering, Bahir Dar Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Tadesse Fenta YehualaDepartment of Food Engineering, Bahir Dar Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was examined to optimize extrusion conditions (barrel temperature, feed moisture, and blending ratios of rice, lupin, and pumpkin flour) during processing high-quality extruded products using a twin-screw extruder. A three-factor with three-level response surface methodology with a Box-Behnken design, was applied to evaluate the effects of selected processing conditions: blending ratios of lupin (10-20 %), barrel temperature (115-155 °C) and feed moisture content (14-20 %) on the functional, nutritional and sensory characteristics of the produced snack food. The independent variables significantly affected the nutritional, functional, and physical properties of the extruded snack food. A higher proportion of lupin showed higher bulk density but lower expansion ratio and water solubility index of the extrudates while higher feed moisture content led to a reduction in expansion ratio and water-soluble index of the extruded snack food. Lupin substitution and pumpkin flour addition significantly increased the protein, crude fiber, ash, fat, β-carotene, iron, and zinc contents of the white rice-lupin-pumpkin extruded snack, whereas the total carbohydrate content was reduced. The sensory evaluation showed that it was possible to incorporate lupin flour up to a certain level without affecting consumer acceptance. A blending ratio of 15 %, feed moisture of 14 %, and barrel temperature of 155 °C produced the extrudate with a desirability value of 0.75.

Indexed as

Blending ratioExtruded snackLupinNutritional compositionOptimizationPhysical and functional propertiesPumpkinRiceSensory

Identifiers

PMID39720086
PMCPMC11667639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.