ArticleHeliyon2024
Efficacy of virtual reality pure-tone audiometry in training of hearing test for audiologist.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: The immersive virtual reality (VR) simulator is advantageous because it is cost-effective, realistic, can be controlled directly by the user, and can be integrated into education and training in otorhinolaryngology. The present study explored the feasibility of incorporating VR pure-tone audiometry (PTA) into an audiologist training curriculum, and assessed audiology experts' willingness to use a VR PTA. Materials and methods: A total of 31 audiologists (16 skilled audiologists and 15 undergraduate students) participated in the study, using a developed VR PTA application with a Meta Quest 2 device. A digital twin technique was applied for a realistic environment. The study measured key components of the VR system and behavioral intention to use VR PTA and traditional PTA using a modified version of the Technology Acceptance Model survey. The survey outcomes for VR PTA and the traditional PTA were compared, using a paired Results: The general characteristics of the participants were homogeneous. In the homogeneity test, no statistically significant differences were found between the ratings of VR PTA and traditional PTA. The comparison between VR PTA and traditional PTA revealed no significant differences between skilled audiologists and undergraduate students for all variables. Conclusions: The VR PTA and traditional PTA had no differences in of VR system characteristics and behavioral intention to use. The efficacy of the VR PTA was validated, and previous experience with traditional PTA was not affected by adopting VR PTA. Further studies are needed to assess performance enhancements in audiological testing through VR simulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.