ArticleHeliyon2024
Efficiency of potato peel extract in the preservation of cow butter.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-assisted water based sustainable extraction of potato peel extract for the development of potato starch based active edible films for the preservation of fresh-cut potatoes.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- The Valorization of Potato Peels as a Functional Ingredient in the Food Industry: A Comprehensive Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates that the phenolic compound extracted from the potato peels using ethanol by maceration as a natural preservation agent for cow butter, yielding 10.42 ± 0.03 % phenolic compound. A quantitative and qualitative analysis of potato peels extract (PPE) was conducted to examine the phenolic compounds. The major preliminary phytochemical screenings (Alkaline Reagent Test, Ferric Chloride Test, Chloride Test) were performed to detect the presence of phenols, flavonoids, and tannins. The total phenolic content was measured using the Folin-Ciocalteu method with UV spectrophotometry, which produced 2.9468 ± 0.03 mg GAE/g of dry extract. The total flavonoid content was determined using the aluminum chloride colorimetric method, resulting in 3.6885 ± 0.02 mg equivalent Quercetin/g of dry extract. During 21 days, butter samples treated with PPE at various concentrations (0.2 % and 0.3 %) and storage temperatures (20 °C and 45 °C) were examined for chemical parameters (peroxide value and free fatty acid value) and microbiological parameters (aerobic total bacterial count and yeast mould count). The findings showed that the samples preserved at 20 °C with a concentration of 0.3 % extract had better preservation than samples stored at other temperatures. It also showed lower values of peroxide and free fatty acids, as well as less microbial growth. On the other hand, samples without extract that were kept at 45 °C demonstrated more oxidation and microbial growth. The oxidative stability of cow butter was assessed using the Rancimat method. Results indicate that PPE significantly enhances both oxidative stability and shelf life, offering preservative benefits for up to six months. Specifically, the induction period (IP) at room temperature reached 3960 h (165 days) with PPE, compared to only 120 h (5 days) without it. These findings suggest that the phenolic compounds in the potato peels could serve as natural preservatives for cow butter, particularly when stored at lower temperatures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.