Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720070›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Retrieval of carbon and inorganic phosphorus during hydrothermal carbonization: ANN and RSM modeling.

Abolfazl Shokri, Mohammad Amin Larki, Ahad Ghaemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abolfazl ShokriSchool of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Amin LarkiSchool of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Ahad GhaemiSchool of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, modeling and optimization of Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) of Poultry litter were conducted to convert it into high-value materials. The aim was to understand the process and predict the effect of the influencing parameters on the product properties. The recovery of Inorganic Phosphorous (IP) and Carbon (C) was regarded as the model's response, although temperature and reaction time were thought to be important variables. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used along with temperature and time data sets ranging from 150 to 300C and 30-480 min, respectively, to identify the parameters influencing the response, three-dimensional networks, and optimization. Next, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF) were used to compare the results and improve the model fit. For these two neural networks, 7 neurons in two layers and 14 neurons in one layer were the ideal numbers. With fewer neurons and better accuracy and efficiency, the MLP model beat RBF with lower Mean Squared Error (MSE) values for both C (0.0015812 vs. 0.0037103) and IP (0.0014376 vs. 0.00623011) recovery and a higher R

Indexed as

Artificial neural networks (ANN)Hydrochar (HC)Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC)OptimizationPoultry litter (PL)

Identifiers

PMID39720070
PMCPMC11665458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.