ReviewHeliyon2024
Artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques for suicide prediction: Integrating dietary patterns and environmental contaminants.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Suicide and Sleep Disorders: The Role of Insomnia, Nightmares, and Circadian Disruption.Cureus · 2026Review
- Explainable Text-Based Depression and Suicide Risk Prediction from Social Media Using Deep Learning and Graph Neural Networks.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Capric Acid-Based Therapeutic Deep Eutectic Systems: A Focused Review Within the Framework of Deep Eutectic Solvents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suicide remains a leading cause of death globally, with nearly 800,000 deaths annually, particularly among young adults in regions like Europe, Australia, and the Middle East, highlighting the urgent need for innovative intervention strategies beyond conventional methods. Objectives: This review aims to explore the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in enhancing suicide risk prediction and developing effective prevention strategies, examining how these technologies integrate complex risk factors, including psychiatric, socio-economic, dietary, and environmental influences. Methods: A comprehensive review of literature from databases such as PubMed and Web of Science was conducted, focusing on studies that utilize AI and ML technologies. The review assessed the efficacy of various models, including Random Forest, neural networks, and others, in analyzing data from electronic health records, social media, and digital behaviors. Additionally, it evaluated a broad spectrum of dietary factors and their influence on suicidal behaviors, as well as the impact of environmental contaminants like lithium, arsenic, fluoride, mercury, and organophosphorus pesticides. Conclusions: AI and ML are revolutionizing suicide prevention strategies, with models achieving nearly 90 % predictive accuracy by integrating diverse data sources. Our findings highlight the need for geographically and demographically tailored public health interventions and comprehensive AI models that address the multifactorial nature of suicide risk. However, the deployment of these technologies must address critical ethical and privacy concerns, ensuring compliance with regulations and the development of transparent, ethically guided AI systems. AI-driven tools, such as virtual therapists and chatbots, are essential for immediate support, particularly in underserved regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.