ArticleHeliyon2024
Proteomics and machine learning: Leveraging domain knowledge for feature selection in a skeletal muscle tissue meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discovery-Driven Plasma Proteomics Identifies a Multi-Protein Signature for Amyloid PET Positivity: A Machine Learning Analysis of the Bio-Hermes Cohort.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Omics techniques, such as proteomics, contain crucial data for understanding biological processes, but they remain underutilized due to their high dimensionality. Typically, proteomics research focuses narrowly on using a limited number of datasets, hindering cross-study comparisons, a problem that can potentially be addressed by machine learning. Despite this potential, machine learning has seen limited adoption in the field of proteomics. Here, skeletal muscle proteomics datasets from five separate studies were combined. These studies included conditions such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.