Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720021›Full record

ArticlePreventive oncology & epidemiology2024

Capturing Catchment Area Data Comprehensively: The North Carolina Cancer Health Assets and Needs Assessment (CHANA) Approach.

Lisa P Spees, Chris D Baggett, Katie E Johnson, Ana I Salas, Hayley N Morris, Emma G Arsali, Marc A Emerson, Mya L Roberson, Andrew F Olshan, Stephanie B Wheeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive oncology & epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa P SpeesDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Chris D BaggettLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Katie E JohnsonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Ana I SalasLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Hayley N MorrisLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Emma G ArsaliDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Marc A EmersonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Mya L RobersonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Andrew F OlshanLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Stephanie B WheelerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Program Project – Improving Provider Announcement Communication Training (IMPACT)P01CA250989 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI OZAWA, SACHIKO · 2021 to 2025
$11.7M
Patient Navigation in Gynecologic Oncology: Improving Care among Rural Endometrial Cancer PatientsK01MD016989 · NIMHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Lisa Patterson Spees · 2022 to 2026
$539k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA250989NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD016989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A key requirement of community outreach and engagement offices within National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers is to conduct a comprehensive examination of their catchment area's population, cancer burden, and assets. To accomplish this task, we describe the plan for implementing our initiative, the Cancer Health Assets and Needs Assessment (CHANA). CHANA compiles, into a single source, up-to-date data that describes the cancer landscape of North Carolina's 100 counties. Methods: CHANA utilized a three phased approach: 1) compiling existing data from publicly available sources; 2) analyzing novel data source, which links state cancer registry, multi-payer insurance claims, and area-level contextual data; and 3) conducting surveys of the general public and cancer survivors and key informant interviews with cancer-related community organizations to understand their priorities and resources. These multifaceted data resources are curated and compiled into three key dissemination products: a summary report, county-level profile reports, and interactive online data dashboards. Discussion: Through data-driven efforts like CHANA, cancer centers and the communities they serve can better understand gaps in care and information needs, opportunities, and resources to improve health outcomes, and priorities for new research and programmatic endeavors focused on prevention, healthcare access, equity, and quality.

Indexed as

cancer burdencancer registrycatchment arealinked databasepopulation-based data

Identifiers

PMID39720021
PMCPMC11666249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.