ArticleIntegrated pharmacy research & practice2024
Expanding HIV Self-Test Kits via Community Pharmacies in Rwanda Has Improved Availability, but Affordability Remains an Issue.
Article in Integrated pharmacy research & practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Affecting Access to and Utilisation of HIV/AIDS Preventive Services Among Young Single Mothers Working in Alcohol Serving Establishments in Rwanda: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Enhancing HIV self-testing uptake among university students in Rwanda: the proportion, barriers, and opportunities.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends HIV self-testing (HIVST) to complement the existing HIV testing services. Pursuant to this, Rwanda approved the over-the-counter sale of Oral Quick HIV self-tests in community pharmacies, facilitating home testing and addressing accessibility issues. However, the availability and affordability of HIVSTs in these settings remains unexplored. Hence, this study determined the availability and affordability of HIVST kits in Community Pharmacies across Rwanda. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 220 licensed community pharmacists between February and May 2023. Tools standardized by WHO and Health Action International (HAI) were used to evaluate the affordability of HIVST kits. An ANOVA followed by a post-hoc test examined significant price differences across regions. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors associated with the availability of HIVST kits. Results: The availability was 76%, with 53% being finger-stick tests. Pharmacies owned by pharmacists were almost twice as likely to have HIVST available (AOR=1.858; 95%: 1.280-2.629, p=0.007) than their counterparts. Pharmacies in Kigali were more likely to stock HIVST (AOR=3.549; 95%: 1.283-9.814, p=0.015) than in other regions. Pharmacies experiencing frequent requests for HIVST were more likely to have HIVST available (AOR=0.22; 95%: 0.07-0.66, p<0.001) than those with fewer requests. Both oral quick and finger-stick HIVST were priced beyond the affordability of low-income earners. Moreover, significant price differences for Oral Quick HIVST (F=11.349; p<0.001) were observed across regions, with Kigali's prices significantly differing from those in the southern (p<0.001) and western Provinces (p=0.004). Conclusion: HIVSTs are not economically priced for the lowest-paid workers, with variations in availability and prices across the country. Policymakers should apply subsidies or price regulation strategies to make HIVST more affordable, ensuring equitable access to all regions and income levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.