Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720015›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2024

Equitable and effective clinical guidance development and dissemination: trauma aims to lead the way.

Lacey N LaGrone, Deborah M Stein, Danielle J Wilson, Eileen M Bulger, Ashley Farley, Andrés M Rubiano, Maria Michaels, Meghan B Lane-Fall, Michael A Person, Vanessa P Ho and 2 more

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. TRAUMA: making trauma clinical guidance more implementable.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lacey N LaGroneTrauma Acute Care Surgery, Medical Center of the Rockies, Loveland, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4749-969X
Deborah M SteinDepartment of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3683-3963
Danielle J WilsonDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-6545-2832
Eileen M BulgerDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ashley FarleyBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Andrés M RubianoNeuroscience Institute, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.
Maria MichaelsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Meghan B Lane-FallPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael A PersonDepartment of Surgery, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA.
Vanessa P HoDepartment of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-2555
Linda ReinhartGrand View Health, Sellersville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Elliott R HautDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-771X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thirty-four per cent of deaths among Americans aged 1-46 are due to injury, and many of these deaths could be prevented if all hospitals performed as well as the highest-performing hospitals. The Institute of Medicine and the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine have called for learning health systems, with emphasis on clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as a means of limiting preventable deaths. Reduction in mortality has been demonstrated when evidence-based trauma CPGs are adhered to; however, guidelines are variably updated, redundant, absent, inaccessible, or perceived as irrelevant. Ultimately, these barriers result in poor guideline implementation and preventable patient deaths. This multidisciplinary group of injury providers, clinical guidance developers and end users, public health and health policy experts and implementation scientists propose key areas for consideration in the definition of an ideal future state for clinical guidance development and dissemination. Suggestions include (1): professional societies collaborate rather than compete for guideline development.(2) Design primary clinical research for implementation, and where relevant, with guideline development in mind.(3) Select clinical topics for guideline development through systematic prioritization, with an emphasis on patient-centered outcomes.(4) Develop guideline authorship groups with a focus on transparency, equity of opportunity and diversity of representation.(5) Establish a plan for regular review and updating and provide the date the guideline was last updated for transparency.(6) Integrate options for adapting the guideline to local resources and needs at the time of development.(7) Make guidelines available on a platform that allows for open feedback and utilization tracking.(8) Improve discoverability of guidelines.(9) Optimize user-experience with a focus on inclusion of bedside-ready, mobile-friendly infographics, tables or algorithms when feasible.(10) Use open access and open licenses.(11) Disseminate clinical guidance via comprehensive and equitable communication channels. Guidelines are key to improve patient outcomes. The proposed focus to ensure trauma guidelines are equitably and effectively developed and disseminated globally.

Indexed as

Clinicalguidelinesinjury

Identifiers

PMID39720015
PMCPMC11667293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.