Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720014›Full record

ArticleJournal of marriage and the family2024

USING MIXED METHODS APPROACHES TO STUDY FAMILIES AND RELATIONSHIPS.

Mieke Beth Thomeer, Mia Brantley, Elaine M Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of marriage and the family, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mieke Beth ThomeerDepartment of Sociology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Heritage Hall 460, 1401 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35233.
Mia BrantleyDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University.
Elaine M HernandezDepartment of Sociology, Indiana University at Bloomington.

Funding

Institute for Population ResearchP2CHD058484 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYFORD, SARAH R · 2014 to 2023
$5.0M
Motherhood Biographies and Midlife Women's HealthR01AG069251 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Rin Reczek, Mieke Beth Thomeer McBride · 2021 to 2026
$2.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069251NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed methods research-methodologies that synthesize qualitative and quantitative approaches in the design, collection, analysis, and dissemination of research related to a specific topic or aim-is increasingly common, offering innovative empirical insight into families and relationships. We first elaborate on our definition of mixed methods research, emphasizing that there is significant heterogeneity within mixed methods approaches to studying families and relationships. Second, we discuss benefits of mixed methods projects within family and relationship research, including theory-building and innovation. Third, we provide practical suggestions for designing and implementing a mixed methods project, highlighting useful resources for researchers as they develop research questions, plan designs, collect and analyze data, and disseminate findings. We emphasize the unique opportunities from abductive analytic approaches for mixed methods researchers and point to the need for reflexivity. Fourth, we consider common obstacles associated with disseminating mixed methods research and explain why family researchers need "mixed methods literacy" regardless of their research paradigm. Finally, we identify key areas of future growth for mixed methods researchers. We advocate that understanding mixed methods research has practical benefits, even for researchers not using these approaches. To cohesively build-and critique-our knowledge of families and relationships, family and relationship researchers across paradigms should be familiar with the basic tenets, strengths, and limitations of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research.

Indexed as

Family and Relationship ResearchMixed methods approachesResearch MethodsTriangulation

Identifiers

PMID39720014
PMCPMC11665926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.