ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2024
Evaluating hemodynamic response to treatment in patients with peripheral arterial disease using dynamic vascular optical spectroscopy.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Tracking changes in the vasculature of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) may identify the need for follow-up treatment within only weeks after an initial intervention, enabling timely support and improving patient outcomes. Aim: We aim to evaluate dynamic vascular optical spectroscopy's (DVOS's) ability to accurately monitor the hemodynamics of affected arteries in patients with PAD after a surgical intervention and predict long-term clinical outcomes. Approach: A DVOS system non-invasively monitored the blood flow through 256 lower extremity arteries in 80 PAD patients immediately before, immediately after, and 3 to 4 weeks after they underwent a surgical intervention. Results: Hemodynamic changes measured by DVOS after a revascularization procedure (RP) classified patient long-term ( Conclusions: The DVOS system was able to classify patient long-term clinical outcomes with high accuracy within one month after an RP and distinguish among different interventions. DVOS may be a promising alternative or adjunct to existing monitoring approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.