Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39720009›Full record

ArticlePragmatic and observational research2024

Validation and Final Results from the First Cardiac Lead Post-Approval Study Using Real-World Data.

Steven Mullane, Jacob B Hicks, Kazi Sharmin, Camden Harrell, Angie Rock, Crystal Miller

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pragmatic and observational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01791127 (Safety and Performance Study of the Siello S Pacing Lead), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01791127 terminatednot on this map

Safety and Performance Study of the Siello S Pacing Lead

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBiotronik, Inc.Ran2013 to 2019Enrolled1,758ConditionsSafety and Effectiveness of the Siello S LeadArmsmarket-released BIOTRONIK pacemaker system including one or two Siello S leads.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steven MullaneBIOTRONIK Inc., Lake Oswego, OR, 97035, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3877-4322
Jacob B HicksBIOTRONIK NRO INC., Lake Oswego, OR, 97035, USA.
Kazi SharminBIOTRONIK Inc., Lake Oswego, OR, 97035, USA.
Camden HarrellBIOTRONIK Inc., Lake Oswego, OR, 97035, USA.
Angie RockBIOTRONIK Inc., Lake Oswego, OR, 97035, USA.
Crystal MillerBIOTRONIK Inc., Lake Oswego, OR, 97035, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As part of Electrophysiology Predictable and Sustainable Implementation of National Registries (EP PASSION), a multi-stakeholder collaboration between the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academic and society partners, and cardiovascular implantable electronic device manufacturers, a 5-year bradycardia lead study transitioned from a traditional post-approval study (PAS) to a real-world data (RWD) approach using a novel method to evaluate chronic cardiac lead complications. Methods: Lead complications were identified using a combination of diagnosis and procedure codes from 2013 to 2020 fee-for-service Medicare claims data along with BIOTRONIK device registration and Medical Device Reporting data from patients implanted between 2013 and 2015 with a Solia S lead. A proof-of-concept analysis was performed using McNemar's test to compare lead complications reported in the traditional PAS with lead complications identified in the RWD. Kaplan-Meier survival and incidence rates were evaluated to determine real-world long-term safety. Results: The proof-of-concept analysis of 896 patients found in both traditional PAS and RWD sources demonstrated a 99.7% proportion of overall agreement in identifying lead complications (p = 0.0833). Following this validation, 1841 study leads from 1015 Medicare patients were analyzed. A total of 33 lead complications (attributable or possibly attributable to the study lead) were identified for a rate of 0.005 complications per lead-year. The complication-free rate at 5-years post-implant was 97.2% (95% CI: 96.07%, 98.06%). Conclusion: These results led to the first FDA approval for transition of a cardiac lead PAS to long-term safety reporting using RWD, paving the way for future real-world cardiac lead and device surveillance studies. ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier: NCT01791127.

Indexed as

cardiac leadpacemakerreal-world datareal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID39720009
PMCPMC11668325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.