ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Medial pulvinar stimulation for focal drug-resistant epilepsy: interim 12-month results of the PULSE study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04692701 (Pulvinar Stimulation in Epilepsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pulvinar Stimulation in Epilepsy: a Pilot Study
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A guide to neuromodulation in drug-resistant epilepsy.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Review
- Effects of pulvinar and combined pulvinar/anterior thalamic deep-brain stimulation on sleep: preliminary results.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- How Thalamo-Cortical Loops Modulate Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potentials?Brain topography · 2026Article
- Inpatient continuous thalamic stereo-electroencephalography stimulation in the evaluation of focal epilepsy: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Thalamocortical network dynamics in focal epilepsy: SEEG investigation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Thalamic Neuromodulation: New Frontiers.Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- Medial pulvinar stereoelectroencephalographic biomarkers associated with deep brain stimulation response in focal drug-resistant epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Thalamocortical hodology to personalize electrical stimulation for focal epilepsy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Modulation of neural complexity and consciousness in temporal lobe seizures: Effects of high-frequency pulvinar stimulation.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025Article
- Personalized multichannel transcranial direct current electrical stimulation (tDCS) in drug-resistant epilepsy: A SEEG based open-labeled study.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Biomarkers for Epilepsy Deep Brain Stimulation.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2025Review
- New and Old Targets: Evolving Framework for Personalized DBS in Refractory Epilepsy.Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery · 2025Review
- The role of the thalamus in focal human epilepsy: insights from stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG).Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- A comprehensive review of deep brain stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the medial pulvinar nucleus (PuM) in reducing seizure frequency and addressing comorbidities in patients with drug and vagal nerve-resistant focal epilepsy. Methods: This is an open-label prospective treatment trial with a planned enrollment of 12 patients suffering from medically refractory epilepsy (Clinical trial gov NCT04692701), for which the interim 12-month post-implantation results for the first 6 patients are being reported. Inclusion criteria were focal epilepsy not suitable for or after failed surgical intervention and previous failure of neurostimulation therapies (vagus nerve stimulation or anterior thalamic nucleus DBS). Evaluations included seizure diaries, neuropsychological assessments, and scales for depression, anxiety, quality of life, and seizure severity. PuM DBS was performed using ROSA robotic assistance, with follow-ups every 3 months for 1 year. Results: Out of six patients, five completed 1-year follow-up (one patient died prematurely). A non-significant trend toward seizure reduction was observed at 6 months, becoming more pronounced at 1 year (mean reduction: 45%; responders: 2/5). Seizure severity significantly improved ( Significance: Preliminary results suggest that PuM DBS may offer a promising therapeutic option for reducing seizure severity and improving quality of life and cognitive functions in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Despite the small sample size and the presence of serious adverse events, the findings warrant further investigation with larger cohorts to confirm these trends and optimize the treatment protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.