Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719942›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2025

Sociopolitical antecedents influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Pima County, Arizona.

Sam Rodriguez, Kailey Haider, Famesh Patel, Grace Thatigiri, Benjamin Pope, Jasen Albana, Sohail R Daulat, Purnima Madhivanan, Karl Krupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sam RodriguezMel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America.
Kailey HaiderMel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America.
Famesh PatelCollege of Science, Department of Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America.
Grace ThatigiriCollege of Medicine, Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America.
Benjamin PopeMel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America.
Jasen AlbanaCollege of Medicine, Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America.
Sohail R DaulatCollege of Science, Department of Neuroscience and Cognitive Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America.
Purnima MadhivananMel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America.
Karl KruppMel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy among marginalized populations particularly in the Hispanic community over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic has presented as a public health issue. This study examined the relationship between political affiliation and vaccination decisions of Hispanic adults in Pima County, Arizona. Methods: Between January and October 2022, 623 participants completed surveys in English or Spanish after completing informed consent process. Information collected included sociodemographic, political affiliation and philosophy and COVID vaccination uptake. Participants were recruited at different community events in Southern Tucson, Pima County, Arizona. Participants received five dollars for completing the surveys. Data were analyzed with Stata version 16.1. Results: Participants were 81.8 % Hispanic and 18.2 % non-Hispanic. On average, participants were 32.9 (SD ± 11.8) years of age with a median age of 31 (IQR: 23, 41). Participants who had a bachelor's degree or above had 2.9 times greater odds of being vaccinated compared to those who had less than a high school education (Adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.84; 95 % CI: 1.12, 7.22). Individuals identifying as politically liberal had 3.28 times higher odds of being vaccinated compared to those identifying as conservative (OR = 3.28; 95 % CI: 1.5, 7.16). Similarly, Democrats had 3.36 times higher odds of being vaccinated than Republicans (OR = 3.36; 95 % CI: 1.61, 7.01). People who were strongly religious had statistically significantly lower odds of recommending the vaccine to others as compared to those who self-reported as not being religious. Conclusions: There was an association with Hispanic adults who aligned liberal or Democrat to express more favorable views toward vaccinations. Additionally, individuals who were more educated, less religious, and in better financial situations tended to be more favorable toward vaccinations in Arizona.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health disparitiesLatino healthVaccine hesitancyVaccine literacy

Identifiers

PMID39719942
PMCPMC11665536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.