ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2025
Is casting superior to plate fixation in metacarpal shaft fractures?
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to compare the outcomes and conduct a cost analysis between plate screw fixation and conservative treatment. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe retrospective study was conducted with 36 patients (32 males, 4 females; mean age: 30.3±13.4 years; range, 16 to 65 years) between May 2019 and July 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent surgery with miniplate fixation (n=21) and those who were conservatively managed (n=15). The differences in postoperative shortening and angulation were compared between these groups. Additionally, the patients' postoperative functional scores, complication rates, examination findings, and cost analyses were compared.
resultsThe per-patient cost in the surgical group was higher than in the conservatively treated group (€246.96 vs. €45.07; p<0.001). While postoperative shortening and angulation were more pronounced in the nonoperative group, the other clinical parameters and functional scores were improved. The return-to-work time was longer in the nonoperative group due to prolonged immobilization.
conclusionNonoperative splint treatment for metacarpal shaft fractures shows better radiological and clinical outcomes than surgery, except for angulation and shortening, which have limited impact on function. Due to higher costs in surgical cases, nonoperative treatment is more cost-effective. Larger, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.