ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2025
Effectiveness of the Dorr index in predicting implant failure before proximal femoral nail application.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lag screw cutout risk factors in geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the importance of the Dorr index in the preoperative evaluation of implant failure in patients who underwent proximal femoral nail (PFN). PATIENTS AND
methodsThis retrospective study examined 312 patients who underwent PFN for intertrochanteric fractures between January 2016 and January 2020. Patients with unstable fractures according to the AO/OTA (AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association) classification, those over 65 years of age, with at least one year of regular follow-up, a tip-apex distance <25 mm, and a caput-collum-diaphyseal angle between 125° and 135°, were included. Seventy patients (19 males, 51 females; mean age: 72±3.8 years; range, 65 to 88 years) who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. According to the Dorr index, patients were type A if the ratio was <0.5, type B if the ratio was between 0.50 and 0.75, and type C if the ratio was >0.75.
resultsThe mean follow-up period was 46.2±4.4 months. As indicated by the Dorr index, the failure rates were 0%, 17%, and 63% for Dorr types A, B, and C, respectively. The comparison of failure rates between Dorr types A and B (p=0.02), B and C (p=0.016), and A and C (p=0.001) yielded statistically significant results. Patients with Dorr types B and C exhibited significantly inferior outcomes compared to those with type A. The mean time to failure was 27±3 days after surgery.
conclusionDorr index is an important parameter that can be easily checked and used on preoperative radiographs to predict implant failure. The high probability of failure in the early period should be taken into account, particularly if PFN is planned in Dorr type C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.