Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719857›Full record

ArticleAnnals of neurology2025

Staged Screening Identifies People with Biomarkers Related to Neuronal Alpha-Synuclein Disease.

Ethan G Brown, Lana M Chahine, Andrew Siderowf, Caroline Gochanour, Ryan Kurth, Micah J Marshall, Chelsea Caspell-Garcia, Michael C Brumm, Craig E Stanley, Monica Korell and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Effects of α-synuclein pathology on synaptic dysfunction and clinical outcomes in normal aging.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Ethan G BrownDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9744-8562
Lana M ChahineDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Andrew SiderowfDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Caroline GochanourDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Ryan KurthDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Micah J MarshallDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Chelsea Caspell-GarciaDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Michael C BrummDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Craig E StanleyInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA.
Monica KorellDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bridget McMahonInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA.
Maggie KuhlThe Michael J. Fox Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Kimberly FabrizioInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA.
Laura HeathersDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Luis Concha-MarambioAmprion, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9454-8389
Claudio SotoAmprion, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3412-0524
Sohini ChowdhuryThe Michael J. Fox Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Christopher S CoffeyDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Tatiana M ForoudDepartment of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Tanya SimuniDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kenneth MarekInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, CT, USA.
Caroline M TannerDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative

Funding

Production and Distribution of well-characterized polymorphic variants of alpha-synuclein aggregatesU24AG079685 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CLAUDIO SOTO · 2022 to 2026
$3.8M
Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research MJFF-022651NIA NIH HHS U24 AG079685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRemote identification of individuals with severe hyposmia may enable scalable recruitment of participants with underlying alpha-synuclein aggregation. We evaluated the performance of a staged screening paradigm using remote smell testing to enrich for abnormal dopamine transporter single-photon emission computed tomography imaging (DAT-SPECT) and alpha-synuclein aggregation.

methodsThe Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) recruited participants for the prodromal cohort who were 60-years and older without a Parkinson's disease diagnosis. Participants were invited to complete a University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) independently through an online portal. Hyposmic participants were invited to complete DAT-SPECT, which determined eligibility for enrollment in longitudinal assessments and further biomarker evaluation including cerebrospinal fluid alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay (aSynSAA).

resultsAs of January 29, 2024, 49,843 participants were sent an UPSIT and 31,293 (63%) completed it. Of UPSIT completers, 8,301 (27%) scored <15th percentile. Of 1,546 who completed DAT-SPECT, 1,060 (69%) had DAT-SPECT binding <100% expected for age and sex. Participants with an UPSIT <10th percentile (n = 1,221) had greater likelihood of low DAT-SPECT binding compared to participants with an UPSIT in the 10th to 15th percentile (odds ratio, 3.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-4.91). Overall, 55% (198/363) of cases with UPSIT <15th percentile and DAT-SPECT <100% had positive aSynSAA, which increased to 70% (182/260) when selecting for more severe hyposmia (UPSIT <10th percentile).

interpretationRemote screening for hyposmia and reduced DAT-SPECT binding identifies participants with a high proportion positive aSynSAA. Longitudinal data will be essential to define progression patterns in these individuals to ultimately inform recruitment into disease modification clinical trials. ANN NEUROL 2025;97:730-740.

Indexed as

alpha-SynucleinOlfaction DisordersParkinson DiseaseSynucleinopathiesAgedBiomarkersCohort StudiesDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProdromal SymptomsTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photonalpha-SynucleinBiomarkersDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39719857
PMCPMC11889527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.