ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025
Characterization of Tip Fold-Over Using Fluoroscopy and Intracochlear Pressure in Cadaver Specimens.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing Slim Straight and Slim Perimodiolar Electrode Arrays for Cochlear Implantation: Hearing Results and Risks-A Systematic Review (2015-2025).Audiology research · 2026Review
- Evaluation of tip fold over in 1,575 cochlear implant electrode arrays.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Towards atraumatic cochlear implant insertion monitoring using a hydraulic-based, cost-effective intracochlear pressure probe.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesCochlear implant array malpositioning is associated with impaired speech perception, vertigo, and facial nerve stimulation. Tip fold-over is a subset of malpositioning that occurs more often with perimodiolar electrodes, but historically it has not been characterized due to lack of knowledge regarding electrode movements of the electrode within the cochlea. The aim of this study was to characterize the mechanics of tip fold-over events and their associated insertion pressure profiles.
methodsCadaveric human heads were surgically prepared with a mastoidectomy and facial recess. Fiberoptic pressure sensors were inserted into the scala vestibuli and tympani to measure intracochlear pressures. Perimodiolar CI electrodes (Cochlear Slim-Modiolar, CI532) were inserted via round window under fluoroscopy.
resultsThree types of tip fold-over events were observed: anterior-posterior C-shaped, medial-lateral C-shaped, and S-shaped roll-overs. The largest transient pressures occurred with anterior-posterior and S-type roll-over, and were associated with rotation or twisting inside the cochlea.
conclusionsResults demonstrate at least three subtypes of tip fold-overs. Elevated pressure transients were noted before and during the tip fold-over event related to electrode twisting. The characterization of tip fold-over into subtypes is novel and may aid identification of tip fold-over events intraoperatively in the future. It remains important to identify tip fold-over events, and they should be recognized early using a multimodal verification system. Further investigation is still required to determine the significance of these changes and other possible patterns of intracochlear electrode movement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA: Cadaver study Laryngoscope, 135:1795-1802, 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.