Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719739›Full record

ArticleBiomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie2025

Characterization of focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier disruption effect on inflammation as a function of treatment parameters.

Cleide Angolano, Emily Hansen, Hala Ajjawi, Paige Nowlin, Yongzhi Zhang, Natalie Thunemann, Christiane Ferran, Nick Todd

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cleide AngolanoDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Center for Vascular Biology Research, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Emily HansenHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Hala AjjawiHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Paige NowlinDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Yongzhi ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Natalie ThunemannDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Christiane FerranDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Center for Vascular Biology Research, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Division of Nephrology and the Transplant Institute, Department of Nephrology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Nick ToddDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: ntodd1@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Improved Delivery of Gene Therapies to the Central Nervous System by Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Disruption of the Blood-Brain BarrierR01NS123557 · NINDS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Nicholas E. Todd · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
Understanding the relationships between FUS-BBB opening, neuroinflammation and the neurovascular responseR21EB030173 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TODD, NICHOLAS E. · 2020 to 2022
$739k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB030173NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The technology of focused ultrasound-mediated disruption of the blood-brain barrier (FUS-BBB opening) has now been used in over 20 Phase 1 clinical trials to validate the safety and feasibility of BBB opening for drug delivery in patients with brain tumors and neurodegenerative diseases. The primary treatment parameters, FUS intensity and microbubble dose, are chosen to balance sufficient BBB disruption to achieve drug delivery against potential acute vessel damage leading to microhemorrhage. However, other safety considerations due to second order effects caused by BBB disruption, such as inflammation and alteration of neurovascular function, are only beginning to be understood. This study builds on previous work that has investigated the inflammatory response following FUS-BBB opening. In this study, we characterize the effect of FUS intensity, microbubble dose and single vs multiple treatments on the extent of BBB disruption, observed level of microhemorrhage, and degree of inflammatory response at acute post-treatment time points in the wild-type mouse brain. Results show that upregulation of pro-inflammatory markers is primarily driven by microbubble dose, with peak effects seen at 24 hours post-treatment. We additionally saw significantly elevated levels of cytokine and chemokine markers in female vs male mice, despite no sex differences in level of BBB disruption or microglia activation. Multiple treatments did not result in increased levels of pro-inflammatory markers compared to single treatment baseline. However, we did see an interesting elevation of the anti-inflammatory molecule eNOS after multiple treatments, indicating active mechanisms were at work to restore homeostasis in the brain environment.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierInflammationMice, Inbred C57BLMicrobubblesAnimalsBrainCytokinesDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleMaleMiceUltrasonic WavesCytokinesBlood-brain barrierFocused ultrasoundInflammation

Identifiers

PMID39719739
PMCPMC11803570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.