ArticleBiomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie2025
Characterization of focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier disruption effect on inflammation as a function of treatment parameters.
Article in Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving T-cell engager efficacy in glioblastoma with multi-antigen targeting and novel delivery approaches.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Review
- Multistage nanomedicine engineering to overcome sequential barriers to glioblastoma treatment: a review.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Precision Drug Delivery Strategies for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Opportunities and Challenges of FUS-BBBO and Spatial Molecular Profiling.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Blood‒brain barrier opening with Golay-coded ultrasound to improve therapeutic consistency in glioblastoma models.Drug delivery · 2025Article
- Updates on cancer vaccines in brain cancer: Advances in neuroblastoma, delivery systems, and emerging technologies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Controlled localization of ultrasound heating using magnetic nanoparticle assemblies.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2025Article
- Brain Endothelial Cells in Blood-Brain Barrier Regulation and Neurological Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Acoustic immune reprogramming: a novel paradigm for spatiotemporally controlled immune regulation using ultrasound-responsive nanoplatforms.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The influence of VEGFR-2 blockade and focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier opening on the glioma-immune landscape.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Safety of focused ultrasound in neuro-oncology: A summary of preclinical and clinical work.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The technology of focused ultrasound-mediated disruption of the blood-brain barrier (FUS-BBB opening) has now been used in over 20 Phase 1 clinical trials to validate the safety and feasibility of BBB opening for drug delivery in patients with brain tumors and neurodegenerative diseases. The primary treatment parameters, FUS intensity and microbubble dose, are chosen to balance sufficient BBB disruption to achieve drug delivery against potential acute vessel damage leading to microhemorrhage. However, other safety considerations due to second order effects caused by BBB disruption, such as inflammation and alteration of neurovascular function, are only beginning to be understood. This study builds on previous work that has investigated the inflammatory response following FUS-BBB opening. In this study, we characterize the effect of FUS intensity, microbubble dose and single vs multiple treatments on the extent of BBB disruption, observed level of microhemorrhage, and degree of inflammatory response at acute post-treatment time points in the wild-type mouse brain. Results show that upregulation of pro-inflammatory markers is primarily driven by microbubble dose, with peak effects seen at 24 hours post-treatment. We additionally saw significantly elevated levels of cytokine and chemokine markers in female vs male mice, despite no sex differences in level of BBB disruption or microglia activation. Multiple treatments did not result in increased levels of pro-inflammatory markers compared to single treatment baseline. However, we did see an interesting elevation of the anti-inflammatory molecule eNOS after multiple treatments, indicating active mechanisms were at work to restore homeostasis in the brain environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.