ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2024
The prognostic impact of stress hyperglycemia ratio on mortality in cardiogenic shock: a MIMIC-IV database analysis.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stress hyperglycemia ratio in risk stratification and treatment optimization for patients on invasive mechanical ventilation: a secondary analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of glycaemic variability for mortality in cardiogenic shock patients: a retrospective cohort study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and neovascular glaucoma in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Stress hyperglycemia ratio and risk of incident myocardial infarction in the general population: a large-scale cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of stress hyperglycemia ratio on incidence of in-hospital cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective, multicenter study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Observational
- The association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and 1-year outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective large sample cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) has been established as a predictor of unfavorable outcomes across various diseases. However, its relationship with prognosis in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between SHR and outcomes in CS patients.
methodsA total of 904 CS patients with their first ICU admission were included in this study, utilizing data from the American Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality at 30 days and 360 days. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the tertiles of the SHR.
resultsThe mean age of the cohort was 67.62 years, with 67.3% of participants being men. During the follow-up period, 221 patients (24.4%) died within 30 days, and 360 patients (39.8%) died within 360 days. The 30-day all-cause mortality rates were 16.9%, 22.3%, and 34.2% in the T1, T2, and T3 groups, respectively (p < 0.001), while the 360-day all-cause mortality rates were 34.9%, 39.0%, and 45.6%, respectively (p = 0.015). Compared with patients in T1, those in T3 exhibited a significantly higher risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (HR = 2.140, 95% CI: 1.522-3.008, p < 0.001) and 360-day all-cause mortality (HR = 1.495, 95% CI: 1.157-1.931, p = 0.002). Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses demonstrated an approximately linear relationship between SHR and 360-day all-cause mortality (p for overall = 0.011; p for nonlinearity = 0.099). However, a nonlinear association was observed between SHR and 30-day all-cause mortality (p for overall < 0.001; p for nonlinearity = 0.030), with the risk increasing significantly when SHR exceeded 1.176. Subgroup analyses revealed that the effect of SHR was consistent across most subgroups except in patients with and without acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In patients with AMI, SHR was associated with a significantly elevated risk of mortality, whereas no significant association was observed in patients without AMI. For 30-day all-cause mortality, the HR was 1.059 (95% CI: 1.040-1.078) in patients with AMI and 1.002 (95% CI: 0.966-1.040) in those without AMI (p for interaction = 0.007). For 360-day all-cause mortality, the HR was 1.043 (95% CI: 1.026-1.061) in patients with AMI and 0.984 (95% CI: 0.955-1.014) in those without AMI (p for interaction < 0.001).
conclusionElevated SHR was significantly associated with increased 30-day and 360-day all-cause mortality in patients with CS, particularly in those with CS complicated by AMI. SHR may serve as a valuable marker for risk stratification and guiding subsequent interventions in CS patients. However, further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.