ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
Optimizing sequence data analysis using convolution neural network for the prediction of CNV bait positions.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate prediction of copy number variations (CNVs) from targeted capture next-generation sequencing (NGS) data relies on effective normalization of read coverage profiles. The normalization process is particularly challenging due to hidden systemic biases such as GC bias, which can significantly affect the sensitivity and specificity of CNV detection. In many cases, the kit manifests provide only the genome coordinates of the targeted regions, and the exact bait design of the oligo capture baits is not available. Although the on-target regions significantly overlap with the bait design, a lack of adequate information allows less accurate normalization of the coverage data. In this study, we propose a novel approach that utilizes a 1D convolution neural network (CNN) model to predict the positions of capture baits in complex whole-exome sequencing (WES) kits. By accurately identifying the exact positions of bait coordinates, our model enables precise normalization of GC bias across target regions, thereby allowing better CNV data normalization.
resultsWe evaluated the optimal hyperparameters, model architecture, and complexity to predict the likely positions of the oligo capture baits. Our analysis shows that the CNN models outperform the Dense NN for bait predictions. Batch normalization is the most important parameter for the stable training of CNN models. Our results indicate that the spatiality of the data plays an important role in the prediction performance. We have shown that combined input data, including experimental coverage, on-target information, and sequence data, are critical for bait prediction. Furthermore, comparison with the on-target information indicated that the CNN models performed better in predicting bait positions that exhibited a high degree of overlap (>90%) with the true bait positions.
resultsThis study highlights the potential of utilizing CNN-based approaches to optimize coverage data analysis and improve copy number data normalization. Subsequent CNV detection based on these predicted coordinates facilitates more accurate measurement of coverage profiles and better normalization for GC bias. As a result, this approach could reduce systemic bias and improve the sensitivity and specificity of CNV detection in genomic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.