SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2024
Elucidating postoperative dynamics in tractional retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of structural and functional outcomes following diabetic vitrectomy, including an analysis of postoperative complications.
Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Viscosity matters: OCTA assessment of retinal microcirculation under silicone oil tamponade.International ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- The Role of Baseline Traction and Diabetes Type in Predicting Recurrence After Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Adjuvant Anti-VEGF in Vitrectomy for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Current Evidence, Timing Considerations, and Clinical Implications.Current ophthalmology reports · 2026Article
- A Standardized 10-Step Algorithm for Vitrectomy in Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diabetic vitrectomy for treating tractional retinal detachment (TRD) by assessing visual acuity improvements, retinal reattachment success rates, and the frequency of postoperative complications. A comprehensive literature search identified 1,211 studies, 30 of which met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The meta-analyses were conducted via random effects models to account for heterogeneity. The primary outcomes were visual acuity improvement and retinal reattachment success, whereas postoperative complications were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Funnel plots, trim-and-fill methods, and Egger's regression tests were employed to assess and adjust for publication bias. The meta-analysis included data from 1,844 eyes across 30 studies. The pooled mean difference (MD) in visual acuity following diabetic vitrectomy was 0.80 logMAR (95% CI: 0.58-1.01, p < 0.0001), with significant heterogeneity (I² = 95%). The trim-and-fill method adjusted the MD to 1.15 (95% CI: 0.85-1.45), indicating potential publication bias. The pooled proportion of retinal reattachment success was 94.63% (95% CI: 90.88-96.89%), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 82.2%). Egger's regression test confirmed publication bias in the retinal reattachment data (t = 6.07, df = 25, p < 0.0001). The most common postoperative complications were vitreous hemorrhage (8.2%, 0-41%), elevated intraocular pressure (7.3%, 0-25%), and cataract formation (10.3%, 0-43%). Diabetic vitrectomy significantly improves visual acuity and achieves high retinal reattachment success rates in patients with TRD despite considerable heterogeneity across studies. However, a critical limitation of the current literature is the lack of comprehensive reporting of essential markers of perfusion, such as the choroidal vascularity index and choriocapillaris flow area, which are crucial for a thorough understanding of the impact of vitrectomy on ocular perfusion and its correlation with structural and functional outcomes. These findings also highlight the need for vigilant postoperative management to mitigate common complications. Adjustments for publication bias via the trim-and-fill method suggest that the initial estimates of efficacy may be optimistic, but the overall benefits of the procedure remain substantial. Further research is warranted to standardize surgical techniques, include detailed perfusion outcomes, and enhance the reliability of future meta-analyses. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.