Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719566›Full record

SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2024

Elucidating postoperative dynamics in tractional retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of structural and functional outcomes following diabetic vitrectomy, including an analysis of postoperative complications.

Miguel A Quiroz-Reyes, Erick A Quiroz-Gonzalez, Miguel A Quiroz-Gonzalez, Virgilio Lima-Gomez

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miguel A Quiroz-ReyesThe Retina Department of Oftalmologia Integral ABC (Medical and Surgical Nonprofit Organization), Affiliated with the Postgraduate Studies Division at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, Lomas de Chapultepec, Av. Paseo de las Palmas 735 Suite 303, Lomas de Chapultepec, Mexico City, 11000, Mexico. drquiroz@prodigy.net.mx.
Erick A Quiroz-GonzalezThe Retina Department of Oftalmologia Integral ABC (Medical and Surgical Nonprofit Organization), Affiliated with the Postgraduate Studies Division at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, Lomas de Chapultepec, Av. Paseo de las Palmas 735 Suite 303, Lomas de Chapultepec, Mexico City, 11000, Mexico.
Miguel A Quiroz-GonzalezThe Retina Department of Oftalmologia Integral ABC (Medical and Surgical Nonprofit Organization), Affiliated with the Postgraduate Studies Division at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, Lomas de Chapultepec, Av. Paseo de las Palmas 735 Suite 303, Lomas de Chapultepec, Mexico City, 11000, Mexico.
Virgilio Lima-GomezJuarez Hospital, Public Assistance Institution (Nonprofit Organization), Av. Politecnico Nacional 5160, Colonia Magdalena de las Salinas, Mexico City, 07760, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diabetic vitrectomy for treating tractional retinal detachment (TRD) by assessing visual acuity improvements, retinal reattachment success rates, and the frequency of postoperative complications. A comprehensive literature search identified 1,211 studies, 30 of which met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The meta-analyses were conducted via random effects models to account for heterogeneity. The primary outcomes were visual acuity improvement and retinal reattachment success, whereas postoperative complications were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Funnel plots, trim-and-fill methods, and Egger's regression tests were employed to assess and adjust for publication bias. The meta-analysis included data from 1,844 eyes across 30 studies. The pooled mean difference (MD) in visual acuity following diabetic vitrectomy was 0.80 logMAR (95% CI: 0.58-1.01, p < 0.0001), with significant heterogeneity (I² = 95%). The trim-and-fill method adjusted the MD to 1.15 (95% CI: 0.85-1.45), indicating potential publication bias. The pooled proportion of retinal reattachment success was 94.63% (95% CI: 90.88-96.89%), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 82.2%). Egger's regression test confirmed publication bias in the retinal reattachment data (t = 6.07, df = 25, p < 0.0001). The most common postoperative complications were vitreous hemorrhage (8.2%, 0-41%), elevated intraocular pressure (7.3%, 0-25%), and cataract formation (10.3%, 0-43%). Diabetic vitrectomy significantly improves visual acuity and achieves high retinal reattachment success rates in patients with TRD despite considerable heterogeneity across studies. However, a critical limitation of the current literature is the lack of comprehensive reporting of essential markers of perfusion, such as the choroidal vascularity index and choriocapillaris flow area, which are crucial for a thorough understanding of the impact of vitrectomy on ocular perfusion and its correlation with structural and functional outcomes. These findings also highlight the need for vigilant postoperative management to mitigate common complications. Adjustments for publication bias via the trim-and-fill method suggest that the initial estimates of efficacy may be optimistic, but the overall benefits of the procedure remain substantial. Further research is warranted to standardize surgical techniques, include detailed perfusion outcomes, and enhance the reliability of future meta-analyses. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyPostoperative ComplicationsRetinal DetachmentVisual AcuityVitrectomyHumansChoriocapillaris flow areaChoroidal vascularity indexDiabetic retinopathyDiabetic tractional retinal detachmentDiabetic vitrectomy complicationsPars plana vitrectomyPerfusion markersPostoperative structural outcomesSwept-source optical coherence tomography angiographyVessel density

Identifiers

PMID39719566
PMCPMC11668018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.