ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
A nomogram to distinguish noncardiac chest pain based on cardiopulmonary exercise testing in cardiology clinic.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPsychological disorders, such as anxiety and depression, are considered to be one of the causes of noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). And these patients can be challenging to differentiate from coronary artery disease (CAD), leading to a considerable number of patients still undergoing angiography. We aim to develop a practical prediction model and nomogram using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), to help identify these patients.
methods1,531 eligible patients' electronic medical record data were obtained from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital. They were randomly divided into a training dataset (N = 918) and a testing dataset (N = 613) at a ratio of 6:4, and 595 cases without missing data were also selected from testing dataset to form a complete dataset. The training set is used to build the model, and the testing set and the complete set are used for internal validation. Eight machine learning (ML) methods are used to build the model and the best model is finally adopted.
resultsThe model built by logistic regression performed the best, and among the 29 parameters, six parameters were determined to be valuable parameters for establishing the diagnostic equation and nomogram. The nomogram showed favorable calibration and discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.857 in the training set, 0.851 in the testing set, and 0.848 in the complete set. Meanwhile, decision curve analysis demonstrated the clinical utility of the nomogram.
conclusionsA nomogram using CPET to distinguish anxiety/depression from CAD was developed. It may optimize the disease management and improve patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.